Feedback - Updates (Archived)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sushubh
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 705
  • Views Views 83,338
Status
Not open for further replies.
So, here is the thing. The server, forum is running on, has enough resources to handle whatever traffic it gets for around 99% of the time. But since I am not an expert in optimizing php/sql/nginx/firewall/etc., it sometimes gets overloaded due to whatever reasons including malicious bots and random ddos attacks. This forum does not really make enough money for me to splurge on a server that has 4-5 times the resources it needs so that it does not suffer random slowdowns due to issues out of my control. So, I usually take the shortcut and restrict access using Cloudflare which takes care of most problems.

I am looking at an alternative hosting option which might reduce these random slowdowns. I am not sure if it would work out. But the thing is, forum performance is usually reasonable at most times. And this is the best I can offer while it stays online.
 
nah. this is not a one time thing. and i do not want the responsibility that comes with community contribution. basically, i myself get as annoyed as you folks when forum starts crawling so i understand the issue. if the alternative hosting option works, it might resolve a lot of these issues at around same costing.

i prefer staying on DigitalOcean but they charge way too much for one extra cpu core which could have helped in this situation.
 
I do not think it is CPU bottleneck, this surely is CloudFlare's shit as when turned on Warp+ even during peak times, browsing becomes smooth.
 
I had similar slowdown issues on a xf and some wp sites. Turn out CF was creating more issues than solving. Dynamic content is always pulled from the server and static files are already cached for repeat visitors.
I think this forum is hosted on DigitalOcean droplet. ( india dc ? ). CF is mostly routing it via france.

IMO it's worth disabling CF for a day or two and monitor.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back