From the LCO’s point of view, I understand that I’m considered an inactive customer. However, I do not agree with the condition of recharging for a minimum of 3 or 6 months because of my previous bad experience.
Earlier, I tried using BSNL through the same LCO, but it took almost 2–3 weeks just to set up bridge mode. After that, I was only able to use the connection properly for about one month. Later, almost every morning, there would be no internet connection.
The LCO was always eager to promote Kerala Vision, probably because they provide a higher commission compared to other ISPs. I also tried RailWire through him, but there was a strange issue with the connection. Even though I reported the issue to him multiple times, he ignored it and never took it seriously. However, when I directly contacted the technical head of RailWire, they acknowledged the issue and fixed it.
Another major problem is that whenever there is an optical signal loss or any other issue, he rarely responds to my messages or calls.
There was also an instance when I asked to switch from one ISP to another, and he warned me by saying that I had already switched too many times. But the important point is that every time I switched ISPs, I always made the payment in advance, even before he completed the VLAN tagging or activation process.
Another frustrating thing is that many LCOs here seem unaware that their OLTs support multi-vendor ONU/
ONT devices. For example, if they use a
Netlink OLT, they assume it will only work with Netlink ONUs. In reality, many of these setups support other compatible ONUs as well. Whenever the LCO provided their ONU/ONT, I usually bypassed it and cloned the configuration into my
Huawei ONU instead.