http://www.computerworld.com/action/articl...ticleId=9003634
http://www.tgdaily.com/2006/07/19/intel_to...ore_in_q4_2006/
they are actually taking the shortcut by merging two dual core to form a quad core. so it's not a true quad core in reality. something like that. intel's original dual core were also not technically dual core. amd does it the correct way. however, core 2 duo are still kicking their ass.
http://www.tgdaily.com/2006/07/19/intel_to...ore_in_q4_2006/
they are actually taking the shortcut by merging two dual core to form a quad core. so it's not a true quad core in reality. something like that. intel's original dual core were also not technically dual core. amd does it the correct way. however, core 2 duo are still kicking their ass.