Procter & Gamble does not care if fake products of their brands are sold online!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sushubh
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 20
  • Views Views 2,701
The feeling I got from the call... was more like... I have been forced by my superiors to apologize so let's get this over with.
 
Can we not start a thread on forum on which we pledge not to buy P&G product for a month and look fir/try the alternatives and send that to P&G.
I think it high time we should tell them that they should take consumers seriously.
 
bwahahahaha. it would be a meaningless excercise. best is to make informed personal decisions.
 
i mean if you have to tell them what to do when you receive a fake product of their company they simply need a kick in their ass.
You are doing a favor by telling them what you are telling them
chromaniac said:
bwahahahaha. it would be a meaningless excercise. best is to make informed personal decisions.
I agree it will be but they must know that people are not happy with the response and they should stop taking them for granted
 
Well atleast for the time and pain you took to report the situation to them,they should atleast reimburse the fake product you bought :|
180 odd bucks may no be a big deal for them but It certainly is for me
 
Well I am already supposed to get a refund from Tradus so that is not a concern. :-)
 
So are people here expecting for a brand to offer refund or replacement for item not sold by them ?So the company which sold fake product of a brand not need to be responsible ?
 
I was not expecting P&G to offer a refund, against admin's complaint, but an action against the online retailer would have put them in my good book.
 
I read an article in Chennai a year or so back that about 80-90% of cosmetic products are fake in the bazaar like shops - you know the ones with no bill - cash and carry kind of shops
Scary!
 
That is why I would have appreciated an action by P&G because that would have given me an assurance that they are serious about their products which does not seem to be the case
 
Back