From the
Act:
CHAPTER III
AUTHENTICATION
7. The Central Government or, as the case may be, the State Government may, for the
purpose of establishing identity of an individual as a condition for receipt of a subsidy,
benefit or service for which the expenditure is incurred from, or the receipt therefrom forms
part of, the Consolidated Fund of India, require that such individual undergo authentication,
or furnish proof of possession of Aadhaar number or in the case of an individual to whom
no Aadhaar number has been assigned, such individual makes an application for enrolment:
Provided that if an Aadhaar number is not assigned to an individual, the individual
shall be offered alternate and viable means of identification for delivery of the subsidy,
benefit or service.
So, Aadhar is not mandatory as per the Act itself. Plus, the
Supreme Court has passed an order last year that "...the
Aadhaar card Scheme is purely voluntary and it cannot be made mandatory till the matter is finally decided by this Court one way or the other." The Supreme Court has allowed Aadhar only for PDS and LPG subsidy.
Shoot off an email to
chairman@sbi.co.in stating that forcing Aadhar is in violation of Supreme Court orders. Mark a copy to
supremecourt@nic.in.
My bank was doing a blessed Aadhar Fortnight crap and when the manager asked me for my Aadhar no., saying it was orders from the top, I told him to ask from me in writing. End of story.