-
Amazon Deals - ToS - Like us?
Setting up BSNL FTTH with ONU(Bridge) + Router(OpenWRT)
- Thread starter sayantan45
- Start date
- Replies 47
- Views 439
Solution
@sayantan45 Can you confirm that the bridge and voice profile wan mac does not match the PPPOE wan mac which you use on the router
Upvote
0
Some ONTs have bridge issues where it won't work when the bridge profile mac on ONT and the PPPOE wan mac on the router are same. To bypass it, follow the ONT bridge configuration steps (Non Alphion Based):
Note: Do not DELETE other profiles until you create Bridge profile and save/add it.
1. Take Backup of ONT in working state.
2. Take screenshot of WAN status Page with PPPOE and Voice (if you use then don't delete it). Make sure to include your PPPOE WAN MAC from that status page in screenshot as you need to enter it on the router.
3. Create Bridge profile with MTU 1500, Enter your PPPOE vlan, Service mode Internet, 802.1p (null), Disable the LAN DHCP and bind the LAN ports with the bridge profile.
Hit add/save
4. Delete the previous PPPOE profile.
5. Make sure that the WAN MAC last two digits of the Bridge Profile are not the same as PPPOE profile WAN MAC from the screenshot.
Note: Do not DELETE other profiles until you create Bridge profile and save/add it.
1. Take Backup of ONT in working state.
2. Take screenshot of WAN status Page with PPPOE and Voice (if you use then don't delete it). Make sure to include your PPPOE WAN MAC from that status page in screenshot as you need to enter it on the router.
3. Create Bridge profile with MTU 1500, Enter your PPPOE vlan, Service mode Internet, 802.1p (null), Disable the LAN DHCP and bind the LAN ports with the bridge profile.
Hit add/save
4. Delete the previous PPPOE profile.
5. Make sure that the WAN MAC last two digits of the Bridge Profile are not the same as PPPOE profile WAN MAC from the screenshot.
Upvote
0
Solution
5. Make sure that the WAN MAC last two digits of the Bridge Profile are not the same as PPPOE profile WAN MAC from the screenshot
@!!..PD..!! didnt understnad this part..
@!!..PD..!! didnt understnad this part..
Upvote
0
FUc..... getting ipv6 and ipv4 both. and working
PS C:\Users\rockm> ping google.com -6
Pinging google.com [2404:6800:4007:80e::200e] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 2404:6800:4007:80e::200e: time=41ms
Reply from 2404:6800:4007:80e::200e: time=41ms
Reply from 2404:6800:4007:80e::200e: time=41ms
Reply from 2404:6800:4007:80e::200e: time=41ms
Ping statistics for 2404:6800:4007:80e::200e:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 41ms, Maximum = 41ms, Average = 41ms
PS C:\Users\rockm> ping google.com -6
Pinging google.com [2404:6800:4007:80e::200e] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 2404:6800:4007:80e::200e: time=41ms
Reply from 2404:6800:4007:80e::200e: time=41ms
Reply from 2404:6800:4007:80e::200e: time=41ms
Reply from 2404:6800:4007:80e::200e: time=41ms
Ping statistics for 2404:6800:4007:80e::200e:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 41ms, Maximum = 41ms, Average = 41ms
Upvote
0
Which interface i should select?
on LAN getting very good loaded and unloaded latency.
but on wifi 5ghz its lesser but not as close to TP-Link which i showed you yesterday.
see its tested on smartphone: Bufferbloat and Internet Speed Test - Waveform
vs LAN: Bufferbloat and Internet Speed Test - Waveform
on LAN getting very good loaded and unloaded latency.
but on wifi 5ghz its lesser but not as close to TP-Link which i showed you yesterday.
see its tested on smartphone: Bufferbloat and Internet Speed Test - Waveform
vs LAN: Bufferbloat and Internet Speed Test - Waveform
Upvote
0