Tata Sky+ is new service on existing service. There would be no seperate transmission, so the existing MPEG-2 transmission will remain. But the STB's used for new service are MPEG-4 capable, so incase if we are able to use this STB's for any other operator with MPEG-4, then we can use it unlike current STB's which are not capable of that (But STB must also be interoperable)
Right again except Tata Sky+ has MPEG4 technology. STB's are capable of MPEG-4 reception (along with existing MPEG-2 transmission as well)
I can only say this based on SKY+ service of UK, which is PVR service on existing DTH service and no seperate transmission is done for SKY+
If they aren't providing MPEG 4, then why will they advertise it in that manner? I would like to think that they would keep a MPEG 4 beam going for the Tata Sky+ subscribers - maybe that's why they are marketing it as a separate service. They may have taken separate transponder space for all you know ... actually maybe not - there's hardly any space available.
Off the issue, what's the big difference between the two anyway? I have heard that HD is provided on a MPEG 4 backbone but don't see how that matters as none of the operators are offering HD. Competely agree with you on interoperability - it's regulation. BTW, is anyone aware of whether the BIG TV and Airtel DTH STBs (both MPEG 4) are interoperable with Tata Sky and Dish (both MPEG 2)?
I take your point on the PVR service being similar to SKY+ but if the transmission is not in MPEG 4, how does saving the program in MPEG 4 make any difference?? Does Sky+ advertise that the service is MPEG 4 but beam only MPEG 2?
Right again except Tata Sky+ has MPEG4 technology. STB's are capable of MPEG-4 reception (along with existing MPEG-2 transmission as well)
I can only say this based on SKY+ service of UK, which is PVR service on existing DTH service and no seperate transmission is done for SKY+
If they aren't providing MPEG 4, then why will they advertise it in that manner? I would like to think that they would keep a MPEG 4 beam going for the Tata Sky+ subscribers - maybe that's why they are marketing it as a separate service. They may have taken separate transponder space for all you know ... actually maybe not - there's hardly any space available.
Off the issue, what's the big difference between the two anyway? I have heard that HD is provided on a MPEG 4 backbone but don't see how that matters as none of the operators are offering HD. Competely agree with you on interoperability - it's regulation. BTW, is anyone aware of whether the BIG TV and Airtel DTH STBs (both MPEG 4) are interoperable with Tata Sky and Dish (both MPEG 2)?
I take your point on the PVR service being similar to SKY+ but if the transmission is not in MPEG 4, how does saving the program in MPEG 4 make any difference?? Does Sky+ advertise that the service is MPEG 4 but beam only MPEG 2?