Trai spanner in DTH content exclusivity plan

  • Thread starter Thread starter ajuravi007
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 6
  • Views Views 2,390

ajuravi007

Regulars
Messages
20,461
Location
NA
ISP
Airtel
NEW DELHI: Content exclusivity, the USP of DTH operators globally, will not be permitted in India in the near future. Telecom regulator Trai which is set to issue guidelines for the DTH sector by month end will rule that content exclusivity can be allowed in India only after the DTH market matures and reaches critical mass. This implies that for the time being, no DTH player will be able to offer any particular channel exclusively to its subscribers and no broadcaster can have any special tie-up with any DTH player. Trai, when it issues guidelines for the sector, will therefore state that the present ‘must carry’ clause be retained. According to the ‘must carry’ clause mentioned in the DTH license regulations, DTH operators are liable to provide access to content providers and broadcasters on non-discriminatory basis. Even as it will makes it mandatory for broadcasters to provide all channels to DTH players on a non-discriminatory basis, the regulator is also taking stock of the fact that DTH operators may not be in a position to carry every single channel. This is because their capacity is currently limited by the capacity of the equipment installed at the earth station as well as the number of transponders available on the satellites having their footprint over the country. Trai is, therefore, looking at two options: Mandate that DTH players carry at least five channels per group, or mandate that channels be carried based on the popularity of their content. The industry is divided on the issue of content exclusivity with players like Tata Sky demanding that partial exclusivity be permitted as this could be a vital differentiator between DTH players. Tata Sky managing director Vikram Kaushik believes that if partial exclusivity of content is allowed on DTH, it will be an incentive for customers to invest on set-top-box. “In fact, lack of content exclusivity will discourage rather than encourage competition,” he said Bharti Airtel, which will launch its DTH services by the year end, wants the ‘must carry’ clause to be done away with. The company in its response to the Trai’s consultation paper also said that since there is paucity of transponders on Indian territories its not technically feasible to carry all channels and therefore there is a need to review the “must carry clause”. The only other operational DTH operator, Dish TV, however, supports non-exclusivity of distribution.“ The ‘must carry regulation’ is needed to check discriminatory behaviour and safeguard the interests of content providers. There should be no amendment in the clause,” said Dish TV MD Jawahar Goel. Dish TV has found an ally in Sun TV which has said that there should be no change in the ‘must carry’ clause and operators should not be allowed to air any exclusive content to check on discriminatory behaviour. Sun TV is set to launch its DTH venture shortly.
 
The only other operational DTH operator, Dish TV, however, supports non-exclusivity of distribution.“ The ‘must carry regulation’ is needed to check discriminatory behaviour and safeguard the interests of content providers. There should be no amendment in the clause,” said Dish TV MD Jawahar Goel.

Dish TV has found an ally in Sun TV which has said that there should be no change in the ‘must carry’ clause and operators should not be allowed to air any exclusive content to check on discriminatory behaviour. Sun TV is set to launch its DTH venture shortly.

So, Mr. Goel will not mind it if TATA-SKY signs up TNT/TCM (I miss classic english movies)?

DishTv and Sun are against this because nearly all good channels are run by non-Zee, non-Sun entities.

Sun is very strong in South India (mostly Tamil Nadu. I think ETV group channels compete well in other markets). But they can hardly make do with only South Indian channels. People would want to watch Star Movies, HBO, AXN etc. Meanwhile, Zee 's channels are no. 2 or no. 3 on every list. The No. 1 position is held by either Star or One Alliance channels.

With exclusivity, theoretically, Tata-Sky could gain rights for all Star Channels locking out everybody else. But this won't happen because Star (the broadcaster) would be crazy to drop half-its-viewership to favour a company in which it has a minority stake. Tata-Sky too is being pussy-footed about the issue (Vikram Kaushik wants 'partial exclusivity', whatever that is).

Exclusivity will see a realignment in content distribution companies. Will Zee-Turner, One Alliance, the TV18-Viacom partnership remain as they are?

Exclusivity is good. Its the market at work. Viewers will migrate to the platform that offers them the best content and service. Lets have it.
 
its strange.. trai allows Tata Sky to show only channels (zee) it wants to show and other end it also states 'must carry' clause.i think 'must carry' clause is actually 'must provide' clause for broadcasters. broadcasters if they provide channel to one DTH operator 'must provide' same to other DTH operator.
 
So now all channels will also be available on DD Direct+ :hysterical:
 
well.. it may happen that in future DD may start providing pay channels. 'must provide' doesnt mean for FREEinfact DD direct+ can easily get channels as its linked to government. it wudnt have to go to courts for so long like Tata Sky. but dd direct doesnt intend to give pay channels at all right now
 
So now all channels will also be available on DD Direct+ :hysterical:

:hysterical::hysterical:
 
Back