I doubt that the operators will be forced to change their plans.
Let's look at it from the
business' perspective:
The plan you're on is xx mbit/s up to whatever your FUP is - as far as the ISP is concered, the assumption here is that you've chosen a plan suitable to your usage, so if you're a heavier user, you should have a plan with an FUP of 50GB and not one of 8GB.
The FUP is supposed to be a safety-net to prevent what seems to be termed as "bill shock", so if you decide to be a cheapskate and get the plan with the 8GB FUP instead of the 50GB FUP despite knowing that you're a heavier user, that's more your problem than theirs.
That's not how it works in real life - most of us hit 50GB without too much trouble, but it's how the plans are designed (and how they're advertised).
But then again, how does the ISP combat this issue? As I've described in other threads, "unlimited" plans are a farce and the "unlimited" business model is faulty - not to mentione that the economics of the situation prevents them from providing anything like 4mbit/s unlimited for Rs999.
Furthermore, Airtel is in the conundrum now that they have some high-price plans with data-caps of 100-200GB, and they're charging an arm and a leg for them, so if they introduce a plan with a 100GB cap for say Rs2000 and a 200GB cap for say Rs3000, then people would have virtually no reason to opt for the faster plan with a 200GB cap that costs Rs8000.
In my opinion, they could lower the price or further increase the data-caps on those plans to about 1TB and still kick out a profit, but, that profit margin % is a lot lower than now and the shareholders don't like that much.
ISPs have enough trouble getting people to pay much more than Rs1500 as it is, so if a plan with a 100GB FUP and 512k thereafter was introduced, the uptake could either be too much (causing speed issues with the service) or not enough (not enough % of users take up the plan because it would probably be priced as "too expensive").
From the consumer perspective:
The FUP's are, realistically, too low for a significant percentage of customers.
There aren't many options for FUPs above 50GB (with Airtel's standard plans as of now) which means users are forced to switch to another ISP if that ISP is available in their area or to switch to a plan which has no FUP - 256k unlimited.
The prices of plans with higher FUPs are often too expensive.
In conclusion:
The only difference the new legislation would make is that this can now no longer be called "broadband".
It may, however, encourage the option of either more 512k unlimited plans (which have basically disappeared from the market during 2010) and/or some operators may choose to introduce more options as far as speed is concerned - FUP of XX GB and then 256k thereafter (as you pay now), FUP of XX GB and then 512k thereafter (as you pay now + Rs200 or something)... it might be advertised as something like "double your after FUP speed for only Rs200" - but of course, I personally can only speculate on what other operators may choose to do.
As I continue to learn more about the industry basically every day, I get to play the role of cynic whilst still being positive towards what the future brings for myself, my company and Indian Broadband as a whole.