Even my neighbours feel MTNL is slow, for them HATHWAY is good, i agree with them HATHWAY was indeed good while surfing, but downloads most of the time were less than 60 kb/sec, very rarely i reached near to 60's but i used a lot in video chatting mostly with my dad who is in DXB.
After knowing about FUP in hATHWAY im DAMM disappointed with them and that also only 10 GB, for 512 kbps atleast 50 GB would have been enough.
I do not agree with this statement for myself. MTNL has delivered the speed I paid for. Perhaps they are using a slower speed plan.
My grouse with them is the reliability of the connection
---------- Post added at 05:48 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:42 PM ----------
So why is that HAYAI NZ is charging them 921 INR as monthly charges For 100mbit/s Speeds??
In India hayai is charging 550 as the infrastructure charges monthly??
I really don't think it is an issue. First of all the cost structure will be completely different. Secondly, the potential customer's ability to pay will be different and finally and most importantly, the density of potential customers in India cannot be beaten and that must drive down the infrastructure cost on a per customer basis.
My own personal experience in pricing has been that a seller will sell at a price at which he expects enough buyers will find value to buy. That figure is not always related to the cost of providing the product or service.