Lol bro don't ask me to read or do a search, I suggest that it would be wiser for you to do the same and research MORE on what and all OTHER effects are there and what else can be ADDED to the mix later once they find this is okay(just like water cannon/lathi charge). Yeah no one knew viagra caused heart attacks right? But were happily willing to take it as long as it made their d!c|< hard for an hour! So still justified to overlook some factors to creating and selling it. Don't be OVERoptimistic about EVERYTHING. Learn to see both sides of the coin and learn sometimes good may actually be bad. Yep am sure RFIDs are soon gonna seem fair to some as warthog said! lol.The first part you have bolded from my text is Sarcasm as to the value of humans and the repeat now I'll remember to help you.
The second part you have to direct me as to WHERE I am promoting Burning of buses! 
I will reply like Bruce Lee to those numbskulls, "Boards don't hit back! Same way Buses Don't Hit Back!" Even tearawrists why do you think I have an issue with? Instead of killing whoever the fcuk is causing the problem, they kill the general public! I don't get that logic.Oh the third part about losing lives I meant that when a person blows up something because no other option of self defense then it's okay to let some people die because they don't have speacialized weapons that are directional well by the proposed logic.See someone does something wrong, if they do something to THAT PERSON or Someone In THEIR Family then the effect is gonna be favorable, whereas the person on the road don't matter s#!t to the guy doing wrong. A couple thousands or lakhs from swiss money gonna cover that. I simply imply that non-violent protest(it's not wrong) is a basic right and if you NEED to oppose something BAD/UNFAIR, WHAT ELSE are you supposed to do if even THAT is gonna be met with UNFAIR treatment?!So then I am sure you will be happy then since you can justify for them to use force, I'll justify people turning into tearawrists and blasting home-made stuff in protest of the same. It's like you claiming what can a rubber bullet do? Well in case you didn't know, a rubber bullet hitting you in the eye or some private part is gonna do damage, or if the force is not set correct, differently built people will get affected differently and we're weaklings by default. Someone with weak ear drums are gonna have some consequential effects from the so called SPECIAL equipment you are happy to promote. We're not gonna be wearing COD or Battlefield gear when on a non-violent silent protest. I hope you remember that bro?The comedy is the people so called protesting have to protest from inside a holed up place so that no one else can see what people are protesting about whereas abroad it's done in a public square. THAT's DEMOCRACY! Not the $#!t we're going through. It's like this. For a FAIR FIGHT both opponents have to have EQUAL weapons. Boxers wear on gloves on both sides. How would you like a boxing match to be with one boxer with gloves and another boxer with a gun? Not much worth isn't it. Hence USA, etc, can afford to use s#!T like that because the public have their OWN guns to protect themselves from the gov with guns.We on the other hand have fcuk all in the name of protection against a bunch of corrupt cowards who have goons with weapons, uniformed goons with guns/water cannons/lathis. If we keep something sharp itself they'll say ILLEGAL possession of weapons when we are in honest worry for our safety, but it's okay for a minister or MP to dance around with a GUN! I don't know how you feel your reasoning is rational bro, seriously, but I leave you your opinion. Have Fun. Cheers! Now I'll hold that Jackie Chan face!It would actually be better if the Speaker in the assembly where they're throwing slippers and waving money bundles can use something like that to quiet THEM Down and get on with their future scam plannings in peace instead of using it on the general populace. I rest my case.
The second part you have to direct me as to WHERE I am promoting Burning of buses! I will reply like Bruce Lee to those numbskulls, "Boards don't hit back! Same way Buses Don't Hit Back!" Even tearawrists why do you think I have an issue with? Instead of killing whoever the fcuk is causing the problem, they kill the general public! I don't get that logic.Oh the third part about losing lives I meant that when a person blows up something because no other option of self defense then it's okay to let some people die because they don't have speacialized weapons that are directional well by the proposed logic.See someone does something wrong, if they do something to THAT PERSON or Someone In THEIR Family then the effect is gonna be favorable, whereas the person on the road don't matter s#!t to the guy doing wrong. A couple thousands or lakhs from swiss money gonna cover that. I simply imply that non-violent protest(it's not wrong) is a basic right and if you NEED to oppose something BAD/UNFAIR, WHAT ELSE are you supposed to do if even THAT is gonna be met with UNFAIR treatment?!So then I am sure you will be happy then since you can justify for them to use force, I'll justify people turning into tearawrists and blasting home-made stuff in protest of the same. It's like you claiming what can a rubber bullet do? Well in case you didn't know, a rubber bullet hitting you in the eye or some private part is gonna do damage, or if the force is not set correct, differently built people will get affected differently and we're weaklings by default. Someone with weak ear drums are gonna have some consequential effects from the so called SPECIAL equipment you are happy to promote. We're not gonna be wearing COD or Battlefield gear when on a non-violent silent protest. I hope you remember that bro?The comedy is the people so called protesting have to protest from inside a holed up place so that no one else can see what people are protesting about whereas abroad it's done in a public square. THAT's DEMOCRACY! Not the $#!t we're going through. It's like this. For a FAIR FIGHT both opponents have to have EQUAL weapons. Boxers wear on gloves on both sides. How would you like a boxing match to be with one boxer with gloves and another boxer with a gun? Not much worth isn't it. Hence USA, etc, can afford to use s#!T like that because the public have their OWN guns to protect themselves from the gov with guns.We on the other hand have fcuk all in the name of protection against a bunch of corrupt cowards who have goons with weapons, uniformed goons with guns/water cannons/lathis. If we keep something sharp itself they'll say ILLEGAL possession of weapons when we are in honest worry for our safety, but it's okay for a minister or MP to dance around with a GUN! I don't know how you feel your reasoning is rational bro, seriously, but I leave you your opinion. Have Fun. Cheers! Now I'll hold that Jackie Chan face!It would actually be better if the Speaker in the assembly where they're throwing slippers and waving money bundles can use something like that to quiet THEM Down and get on with their future scam plannings in peace instead of using it on the general populace. I rest my case.
