Finally, TRAI urges Govt to boost broadband growth

  • Thread starter Thread starter Praks
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 21
  • Views Views 6,112
3 years ago? I am still on dial up (much faster than the VSNL-BSNL crap I used to have, though).

TRAI got the competition heated up and thats lead to us having the cheapest telephone services any where in the world.
The govt. basically allowed an oligopoly to come into place when it limited the number of players in each circle. That is why people were paying 16 rupees a minute. It is only after Mukesh Ambani came in that things started moving.

The TRAI is near-useless as far as consumers are concerned. Couldn't even settle the Tata-Sky Sun dispute. They had to go to TDSAT. If they hadn't reached a compromise, it would be another two years before we had a sunrise. A catalyst is only required if a thing can't burn on its own. If the government pours water when a thing ignites, what is the point of even having a catalyst?

But without TRAI and a sensible Govt things can only get worse
TRAI, I might (I stress might) be able to live with. But a sensible government is an oxymoron. Have never seen one and have no hopes of seeing one.

Unbundling of the last mile won't turn crooks into hermits overnight (Valmiki was a once-in-a-lifetime incident). Tata, Reliance, Sify or the others are not suddenly going to be customer friendly. They have no idea of what customer is. I have a theory which goes like this - any organization with over 100 employees automatically starts behaving like a government department - and nothing that I have experienced has made me change my view.

I agree with you about the defense services coz we in Pune have faced similar problems over the setting up of an international airport for more than 15 years now. Even the existing domestic airport is tightly controlled by them. Maybe they should thing of shifting the Southern Command to a sparsely populated area instead of situating it bang in the middle of a growing city.

Unrestricted competition with zero entry barriers is the only way things can be good. Companies will provide good service only when they are frightened-to-death of mass customer migration to a competitor.
 
TRAI and TDSAT have two different functions and hence one cant do the job of the other,
First is a regulator and I love TRAI coz they passed rules like
[*] no change in tariffs for the first 6 months,
[*] favourable rulings that prevented operators from misusing the lifetime offers
[*] pushing for abolition of ADC,,,,,,,,etc
[/list]TDSAT is after all a tribunal and tribunals simply function to resolve disputes.Obviously TRAI as a regulator cant do what a Tribunal can.

In the Sun Vs Tata Sky dispute that could have gone on for 2 years.....as we speak both Sun and Tata are broadcasting,may the better win !!


In the case of hermits vs cheats, all I can say is that competetion always WORKS !!!
Reliance and Tata force customers to buy their handsets(mostly),Sell one tariffa nd then change to something that suits them...........etc
But the Competition ensured that GSM who did not enjoy the CDMA monopoly have also got great competitive offers to the CDMA guys.

In the end if the 4 players/circle is not mandatory,I can envision 2 things ahead

[*] Free for all and dog eat dog pricing,that will kill many operators and those that survive will be a monopoly.No competetion and forget the cheap rates that we now have
[*] Even better things that what we now have,But I doubt the economics..........In the US dont they have free for all Telecom sector and arent their rates highers than our CURRENT rates?Coz only the Big Corporations survive in the end?
[/list] Good times ahead:thumbsup:
 
What I meant was TRAI couldn't enforce its must-provide rules which caused the dispute to move to TDSAT.Finally, we can only hope for something good happening, whoever makes it happen.
 
As long as TRAI is on the customers side and makes rules(which may not be enforcable) I am still happy.I always tell everyone that rules are meant to be broken :)let the Multi Billion corporations break each others necks and slug it out in court trying to kill each others business.I wanna be the monkey that eats the bread while the 2 cats Fight :rofl:besides now everyday people file PILS in the supreme court and the courts are actually coming out with juddements that are on the customers side.If it were not for the TRAI rules what would our fights as customers be based on.Till date Red tape and Beuracracy made life hell for people.Let it make life now hell for corporations.I'm tired of hell..................Gimme some heaven
 
I agree with you about the defense services coz we in Pune have faced similar problems over the setting up of an international airport for more than 15 years now. Even the existing domestic airport is tightly controlled by them. Maybe they should thing of shifting the Southern Command to a sparsely populated area instead of situating it bang in the middle of a growing city.


i believe they (defence ppl) came first there...and the population started settling around them...so why should they move their base???
 
^Yes. It would be much simpler to move 40 lac people to some other place. We don't need an airport anyway. Bombay is just two and a half hours away by bus.
 
:yahoo:

New Delhi, Sept. 17 The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) on Monday urged the Government to take urgent policy measures to boost broadband growth in the country including asking BSNL and MTNL to adopt a franchisee model whereby local players can use their copper lines to offer high speed Internet services.

:whistle:

looks like TRAI is reading our forums , ask why, see my post below

https://broadband.forum/bsnl-dataone-broadband/16154-copper-can-transformed-into-gold/
 
^Yes. It would be much simpler to move 40 lac people to some other place. We don't need an airport anyway. Bombay is just two and a half hours away by bus.


i wasn't talking about moving anybody...u were...won't be able to comment on if u want an airport or not...
 
Pune desperately needs a 24-hour domestic airport, and an international one as well. The problem is the defense services are actively involved in sabotaging every proposal even if the new airport is setup 40-80 kms away from the city. If they can vacate spectrum so that people can enjoy 3-g or whatever, they can surely think about this issue.It would be interesting to see what views people of Bombay, Delhi, Bangalore or Chennai would have if faced with a similar situation, not that they don't have their own share of bad luck in different ways.Anyway, my view was offered as a comparison to the spectrum issue. And it is a valid comparison.
 
We don't need an airport anyway. Bombay is just two and a half hours away by bus.

Pune desperately needs a 24-hour domestic airport, and an international one as well.


are u not contradicting ur statements here???
 
Back