GSLV Failed again, this time with advanced communication sattelite

  • Thread starter Thread starter jdjain3
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 13
  • Views Views 4,412

jdjain3

Regular
Messages
351
Location
NA
ISP
Combo 500
wt ur view, sattelite is GSAT-5 with 24 C band transponder , urgent for broadcasting
 
125 crore blown away in around 50 seconds.but in country where scam run in thousands of crores, this figure should not matter.
 
yeah dude...125 crores on this mission cant be said wasted..its like investing in technology...
 
well these satellites are of course important. not sure about their planned moon mission.
 
^^ u said right , wt sort of dog and mother****er sit on for live commentary , all my day was off after saw the live show,

after reviewing , fault is in software , command failed , some error, ,

I think they will come up again with GSAT-5PC , again like Insat 4C

There is failure all around the world , this failure will make isro more fault free in coming year, because big booster is also on the way GSLV MK111

but my heart is very sad ,

---------- Post added at 03:38 AM ---------- Previous post was at 03:36 AM ----------

look like GSLV hit Santa clause in sky ,
after sad day , some kind of joking , after all no body died , and it is just a rocket , and we will come up with new rocket next year ,
 
yeah dude...125 crores on this mission cant be said wasted..its like investing in technology...

This was not investment, we have already launched 7 GSLV based satellites (including this) of which 2 have failed. But my point is...even after 6 launch why is it that something is still being missed? Why failure?

I cud have understood if they had used some new technology then u can say its an investment. I cud have understood if it was just 2nd or 3rd try.. But this was using same GSLV technology. So why did it fail? Total 7 GSLV engines were purchased from Russia and now 6 are now already used.

I think they will come up again with GSAT-5PC , again like Insat 4C


It wud be called GSAT-5PR not 5PC
 
Back