Even MS realizes that their product has too many features that may not be needed by the home user, hence their various attempts at releasing toned down products like Office Starter, Works which are bundled with OEM versions of
Windows and also Home and Student editions for retail.
Totally agree on this.
If you survey the entire community and ask them what they do on their computers, 90% (including most corporates) do this:
[*]Email
[*]Internet browsing
[*]Listen to/watch
Music/movies
[*]Photos - store/minor edit
[*]Documents/ letters
[*]Spread sheet to feed data
[*]Simple presentations/slides
[*]Slides/Presentations
[/list]
Given this type of a usage, what's wrong if most such basic users, go open source and save on costs?
Just imagine the software on a typical Windows PC:
Windows OS - Xp or 7 : Costs 10000. W7HB costs 6K.
MS Office 2010 : Costs 4000 for Student, 9000 for Home & Biz, 25K for Professional.
A few illegal add-ons like Norton, Mc Afee or whatever antivirus costing about 1-2k
Nero or equivalent : Another 2k
So, a basic PC software suite costs one atleast 15k, if not more. Most of these are procured illegally for home computers, but the corporates do have to pay for these.
All a manager of a corporate needs is an email client, a browser and a basic office program to type letters, make simple presentations and keep cut-pasting data into spreadsheets?
15K per system saved is a HUGE difference to most corporates.
I use a Linux OS on my computer and I do much more than what I've mentioned above.
Coming back to Libreoffice, I agree that the user-interface as well as some functionalities may not even be a match to MSO's, but the difference in features is not justified by the difference in price.