Oppo India News and Updates

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sushubh
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 27
  • Views Views 4,882
so you think, they must use the product they endorse ?
 
Why exactly do you pay someone to become a brand ambassador? This is not a soap or a shampoo we are talking about... This is something much more public.
 
So what? As @InsanE said, I don't think an actor has to use a product they endorse. They are actors for a reason, they ACT!
Do you think Farhan AKhtar would be using an Intex model, Amitabh Bachchan a Zen mobile, or Akshay Kumar a Micromax device? :)
 
I personally think Oppo and Nokia are being super stupid if they are paying lakhs/crores of rupees to Shahrukh Khan, Priyanka Chopra and Sonam Kapoor and they do not even ensure that these actors use their products publicly.
 


Well these companies can't control their private lives, right?
I would rather want actors to use the healthcare products they endorse. You don't want to misguide people about products which directly impact your health and body. Stuff like electronics, furniture, etc. isn't that important IMO.
 
I am not talking about what they use in their bathrooms (soaps shampoos). Phones are a very public item and it is also one of the most competitive markets to be in. And it's not like Oppo or Nokia does not have phones that are nowhere as good as Apple iPhones. Both Oppo and Nokia have phones that are comparable to the iPhone. So the excuse that Shah Rukh Khan would not be driving around in a Santro does not apply here.

A brand like Coke would never tolerate their brand ambassadors drinking Pepsi in public space. That shows how serious one brand is about its value compared to another.
 
Why would she use an Oppo, when she can own products from superior companies like Apple, Virtu, etc. Promotion is just marketing trick, it doesn't defines their Lifestyle. Does Wolverine use Micromax phones?
 
I guess I am the only one here who thinks that brands should take their own brands seriously. No point discussing this further.
 
Back