Osama bin Laden is dead

[rajadeep]

ISI's tagline :- We f**k the people who F**K with us ...Pakistan's message to its citizens is clear... If u help catch the terrorist we have been giving refuge to then you are as good as dead ...

 

[mhsabir]

Ok.. From a purely "technical" perspective... He should have come to the Pak govt & informed them, who would then take over and hand Osama over or whatever. The fact that he was working with the US govt without Pak govt's knowledge actually does amount to treasonMind you, this is NOT my personal view. But just the technical way , I think how things work in general

 

[Sushubh]

pakistan government handing over osama to usa. lol.

 

[mhsabir]

As I said, thats just the technical perspective of things..

 

[mhsabir]

US panel cuts aid to Pak over sentencing of doctor who helped in Osama raid

 

[hitman]

As I said, thats just the technical perspective of things..

Talking abt technical perspective .. Osama shouldn't be in Pakistan in first place ..
But since he was there.. So everything after tht becomes irrelevant .. How hard the pakis try they just can't run away from this truth ..

 

[mhsabir]

Again you are giving your/general/"the right thing to do" viewpoints , And I agree with them ... But, just sit back and see how all governments/countries function, what their policies etc are .. I know its not the same thing, but for example, how do you expect US to react, if one of their citizens, helps identify someone wanted in another country/globally wanted sitting there & that country just lands there, kills him, and coolly walks off. All I am saying is that this would require a president intervention and a "pardon" even in other countries , for such a person to be let off...Which might happen in many countries. Sadly, the way things are, here it may actually require external pressure, like from US above... for him to be let off.

 

[hitman]

No its not the "right thing to do" ..What I stated was totally from technical point of view ..Osama shouldn't be in pakistan in first place ..When a country is accepting millions of $$ aids in the name of fight against terror ..Tht country can't go against the will of their master .. So technically speaking US owes pakistan and can raid any place in pakistan anytime .. Tht right was given by pakis to americans ...So just to say wht would have US done if some citizen etc etc is totally illogical .. Put the whole picture into perpective then only u will get technically right answer ..If US has been accepting $$ from some country and bending its back to do anything just to get money .. Then they too can't have any right to do anything if they r invaded by anyone ..

 

[mhsabir]

You feel that giving aid to another country amounts to owning it? Ok, ... I dont think I can present any argument/discussion that would lead to any sort of agreement on anything. So, I will just move on to another topic

- - - Updated - - -

Also just to clarify - When I say "Technical point of view" & what you say "Technical point of view" obviously has completely different meanings.

- - - Updated - - -

I meant "Official Standpoint" when I say "Technical point of view"

 

[manu1991]

And you think America giving aid means it just transfers the money into pakistan's account? There are hundreds of conditions and agreements to be satisfied before even a single penny is given.