in.com, i can understand, because in.com have people marketing it. They personally go and ask people to use in.com.But I have yet to come across someone marketing personally abt rediffmail.com. And to date I wonder, what does rediffmail have to offer? Indiatimes and rediffmail, worst ever frontend that I have seen.
-
Amazon Deals - ToS - Like us?
Search Engines: Microsoft Bing - WolframAlpha - Yahoo - Google
- Thread starter Sushubh
- Start date
- Replies 303
- Views 70,125
Google catches Bing using their search engine as a source
---------- Post added at 07:09 AM ---------- Previous post was at 05:52 AM ----------
https://imgur.com/613ax
The Joy of Tech comic... laughter is the best tech support.
---------- Post added at 07:09 AM ---------- Previous post was at 05:52 AM ----------
https://imgur.com/613ax
The Joy of Tech comic... laughter is the best tech support.
Bing head says 'traditional search' is dying | The Digital Home - CNET News
Loved the way they call Google's technique of connection between websites to determine ranking, brilliant and in the very next statement, dying.
What Microsoft' PR is bullshitting about is already introduced by Google as +1 experimental feature.
Loved the way they call Google's technique of connection between websites to determine ranking, brilliant and in the very next statement, dying.
What Microsoft' PR is bullshitting about is already introduced by Google as +1 experimental feature.
personal experience. shares on facebook are shittier compared to on twitter. 
facebook is more personal in nature and you are unlikely to share good quality but still random web pages on it. think about it. how often would you share random web pages on the web you found useful on your facebook feed? your friends would get annoyed and would probably hide your content from their newsfeed. twitter on the other hand is more public in nature. your updates are not going to annoy your followers... and google probably realizes it and that is why they launched google +1 button. the links you +1 are not posted on buzz or any other network. they are just stored in a section on your profile page. i can +1 10 links in a couple of minutes and no one would be bothered by it. i share 10 links on twitter/facebook people would start complaining. i used to (and still do) tweet links that i want to bookmark for future access. it's mostly stupid but it does help because those links are then highlighted on relevant google searches. now i am shifting to google +1 for the same.
facebook is more personal in nature and you are unlikely to share good quality but still random web pages on it. think about it. how often would you share random web pages on the web you found useful on your facebook feed? your friends would get annoyed and would probably hide your content from their newsfeed. twitter on the other hand is more public in nature. your updates are not going to annoy your followers... and google probably realizes it and that is why they launched google +1 button. the links you +1 are not posted on buzz or any other network. they are just stored in a section on your profile page. i can +1 10 links in a couple of minutes and no one would be bothered by it. i share 10 links on twitter/facebook people would start complaining. i used to (and still do) tweet links that i want to bookmark for future access. it's mostly stupid but it does help because those links are then highlighted on relevant google searches. now i am shifting to google +1 for the same.Go to Blind Search and perform a search, compare the results and vote.
I did a search and for some reason I already knew which one is Google hehe.
I did a search and for some reason I already knew which one is Google hehe.
