Vikram got another excuse for his failure to get more subscribers and also failed to decrease the rate as like other dths. Let them have only few 100 'quality' customers :rofl:
Failure or success does not depend on number of subscriber, but depends on ARPU (average revenue per user), and overall profit company gets. Any company can have less customers (satisfied!) and can be successful company. Hutch (now Vodafone) also followed same principle in mobile service.
But anyways, I am not happy with the new price rise (although its only Annual/semi-annual, monthly rates are still same), and hope that monthly rates are not rasied further, or it would be difficult to use Tata Sky.
Failure or success does not depend on number of subscriber, but depends on ARPU (average revenue per user), and overall profit company gets. Any company can have less customers (satisfied!) and can be successful company. Hutch (now Vodafone) also followed same principle in mobile service.
But anyways, I am not happy with the new price rise (although its only Annual/semi-annual, monthly rates are still same), and hope that monthly rates are not rasied further, or it would be difficult to use Tata Sky.