Torrent sites blocked by DOT

  • Thread starter Thread starter pomanup
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 47
  • Views Views 12,751
most of these sites are working fine on 5net. screw reliance !!! now that they have found a way to implement a blanket ban on everything they will keep doing it over and over again. this crap is only possible in india. in any other country they cannot issue a blanket ban on a website unless found guilty via trial.
 
It is blocked on Netconnect. This is kind of funny. They blocked a website on USB dongle. It is like they are afraid of users who can download tons of data through USB datacard.

Hehe, they and their stupid data plans. Reliance is showing a puny little IFRAME and using Department of Telecom (DOT) as a scapegoat. The funny thing is that it doesn't have a link to a DoT circular/notice relating to a block/ban.

I think they are monitoring our IP if you take a close look on link. I don't have much knowledge of script but they mention our IP address in their link along with the accessed website. Isn't it?

Yup, they're monitoring for sure and maybe logging our IPs too. Even small ISPs like Alliance/Meghbela operating here in Kolkata log user info in their access logs (from and to destinations) and radius logs (login information userid+time+ip+login count). Whether they purge it or keep it/backups of it for a particular time frame? Dunno

I'm currently looking at Netsweeper white papers :devilish:

**** that 115.... server. I prey to god they face similar fire situation with their data center like Airtel experienced. @airtel presence. Sorry for reminding black out.

LOL.

Fire + BotNets = Hell + DDoS

I use proxies but sometimes I have to fight with the correct proxies and sometimes, it offers me slow speed. It is annoying. Free proxies never give better performance.

Same here.
 
just get a swedish VPN. problem solved.

Don't need vpn. TOR/I2P is good enough for my browsing needs. For downloading needs: SB+FTP and NNTP does the job :)
 
Don't need VPN. TOR/I2P is good enough for my browsing needs. For downloading needs: SB+FTP and NNTP does the job :)
Apart from everything, Hotspot shield works too perfect. No speed drop. You will get the same speed as per your tariff. The reason of not working in my case is I don't know why I have installed Win 8 Dev preview and I have a habit to hibernate the system gives me an error bad_pool_caller while turning on PC from hibernate. I have to restart PC to solve it and uninstall hotspot shield.
I did not find any solution for this error unless I uninstall hotspot shield.

Even TOR sometimes gives varying download speed or slow speed. About hidemyass proxies, some systems like google do not allow us to access because of their proxies detection systems result in to restricted access to some video sites.

----------

just get a swedish vpn. problem solved.
Are you talking about ipredator.se
????

Doesn't it offer premium service? No free service is offered.
 
Hotspot shield messes with my hosts file... have to use Acrylic... which I don't want to :)
 
Hehe, they and their stupid data plans. Reliance is showing a puny little IFRAME and using Department of Telecom (DOT) as a scapegoat. The funny thing is that it doesn't have a link to a DoT circular/notice relating to a block/ban.
Reliance is putting too much energy in blocking websites after it joined a business of Digital Distribution called Reliance Entertainment. It reserves some rights to block contents as it issued previous court orders while hit movies were released but I am not sure that it is allowed to block sites or not without having any proof regarding piracy of its digital copyrighted contents.
Yup, they're monitoring for sure and maybe logging our IPs too. Even small ISPs like Alliance/Meghbela operating here in Kolkata log user info in their access logs (from and to destinations) and radius logs (login information userid+time+ip+login count). Whether they purge it or keep it/backups of it for a particular time frame? Dunno

But they don't have any proof that we are downloading copyrighted contents. If they raid and visit any user to check the hard drives, situation may be serious for that users. However, chances are almost negligible unless they have any tips of heavy pirated content downloaders.
 
Tracing route to amonshare.com [173.192.223.24]
over a maximum of 30 hops:


1 1 ms 1 ms 2 ms Buffalo AirStation Nfiniti [192.168.2.1]
2 5 ms 2 ms 2 ms 117.198.128.1
3 3 ms 2 ms 2 ms 218.248.169.46
4 7 ms 7 ms 8 ms 121.241.98.190.static-delhi.vsnl.net.in [121.241.98.190]
5 19 ms 20 ms 18 ms 172.29.252.34
6 27 ms 28 ms 28 ms 172.31.19.122
7 29 ms 28 ms 27 ms ix-0-100.tcore1.MLV-Mumbai.as6453.net [180.87.38.5]
8 264 ms 248 ms 259 ms if-9-5.tcore1.WYN-Marseille.as6453.net [80.231.217.17]
9 294 ms 279 ms 259 ms if-2-2.tcore2.WYN-Marseille.as6453.net [80.231.217.2]
10 304 ms 279 ms 278 ms if-5-2.tcore1.WV6-Madrid.as6453.net [80.231.200.6]
11 294 ms 299 ms 289 ms if-8-2.tcore2.SV8-Highbridge.as6453.net [80.231.91.26]
12 254 ms 258 ms 259 ms if-2-2.tcore1.SV8-Highbridge.as6453.net [80.231.139.2]
13 283 ms 289 ms 288 ms if-6-2.tcore1.NJY-Newark.as6453.net [80.231.138.18]
14 282 ms 279 ms 269 ms if-2-2.tcore2.NJY-Newark.as6453.net [66.198.70.2]
15 * 275 ms 269 ms Vlan83.icore2.NTO-NewYork.as6453.net [66.198.111.98]
16 265 ms 289 ms 279 ms Vlan503.icore2.NTO-NewYork.as6453.net [216.6.81.34]
17 253 ms 318 ms 259 ms 66.109.11.126
18 262 ms 249 ms 239 ms ae7.bbr01.tl01.nyc01.networklayer.com [173.192.18.176]
19 267 ms 257 ms 318 ms ae1.bbr01.eq01.wdc02.networklayer.com [173.192.18.156]
20 252 ms 269 ms 269 ms ae0.dar01.sr01.wdc01.networklayer.com [173.192.18.197]
21 250 ms 319 ms 269 ms po1.fcr02.sr01.wdc01.networklayer.com [208.43.118.149]
22 266 ms 249 ms 259 ms 173.192.223.24-static.gogohost.com [173.192.223.24]

Trace complete.

Tracing route to amonshare.com [173.192.223.24]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 1 ms 1 ms 2 ms Asus [10.0.0.1]
2 7 ms 6 ms 6 ms 117.198.130.1
3 6 ms 5 ms 5 ms 218.248.169.46
4 5 ms 5 ms 2 ms 115.248.24.238
5 35 ms 25 ms 26 ms 115.255.252.229
6 30 ms 35 ms 27 ms 115.248.224.97
7 97 ms 25 ms 26 ms 115.248.212.234
8 31 ms 38 ms 33 ms 62.216.147.77
9 295 ms 295 ms 296 ms so-0-1-0.0.pjr02.ldn001.flagtel.com [85.95.25.137]
10 300 ms 296 ms 296 ms so-1-0-0.0.pjr01.nyc007.flagtel.com [85.95.25.2]
11 295 ms 347 ms 296 ms xe-2-0-0.0.pjr02.nyc007.flagtel.com [85.95.25.106]
12 294 ms 295 ms 314 ms xe-3-2-0.0.cji01.nyc005.flagtel.com [85.95.26.145]
13 297 ms 296 ms 296 ms te1-7.bbr01.tl01.nyc01.networklayer.com [198.32.160.27]
14 301 ms 301 ms 302 ms ae1.bbr01.eq01.wdc02.networklayer.com [173.192.18.156]
15 327 ms 297 ms 298 ms ae0.dar02.sr01.wdc01.networklayer.com [173.192.18.203]
16 299 ms 299 ms 299 ms po2.fcr02.sr01.wdc01.networklayer.com [208.43.118.151]
17 303 ms 302 ms 303 ms amonshare.com [173.192.223.24]


As expected FTTH goes via TATA links, and DSL via RCOM's.
 
121.241.98.190.static-delhi.vsnl.net.in [121.241.98.190]

DSL = Reliance :angry::pirate:

FTTH = Tata :Boy Thumbs Up::pirate:
 
Back