sneezymelon
NetZombie
^maybe someone else might have downloaded from your account. Change your password to a stronger one and report whether that stops the un-accounted usage
-
Amazon Deals - ToS - Like us?
TriBand session history usage reports incorrect total
- Thread starter knura
- Start date
- Replies 33
- Views 7,400
^
maybe someone else might have downloaded from your account. Change your password to a stronger one and report whether that stops the un-accounted usage
even if u get hold of some one else password u can not use them right coz of port binding.
maybe someone else might have downloaded from your account. Change your password to a stronger one and report whether that stops the un-accounted usage
even if u get hold of some one else password u can not use them right coz of port binding.
ashishgoel
Don
port binding is not fool-proof
port binding is not fool-proof
well i have account details of some mtnl customers but i am unable use it for myself.
ps:just for ur kind infromation i did not want to steal and use some other sppl account .Just wanted to see whether the loophole still exist or not.
well i have account details of some mtnl customers but i am unable use it for myself.
ps:just for ur kind infromation i did not want to steal and use some other sppl account .Just wanted to see whether the loophole still exist or not.
sneezymelon
NetZombie
chhor ki daadhi mein tinka
ahem..
ahem..
shashankkosta
Newbie
even my last months session usage history has some errors...!if i add all the bytes (after converting to mbs) on that page, it comes down to 1887.31 MB, but the page shows it as 2389.05 MB, dats a difference of about 500 MB.""2389.05 - 1887.31 MB = 501.74""so do i need to pay 500 rs extra this month? i still haven't got my telephone bill for the last month so can't really say how much amount they are going to debit.and for this month, when the total should have been arnd 24 MB on Oct 2, it was showing 100 MB....so, wat m i supposed to do? should i call 1504 and explain this problem to them or should i mail the excel sheet to the dgm directly?never had any such problems with mtnl in the past 2 yrs, no downtime, no line problem, nothing...
and i was on 590 NU plan at that time, now i've switched to NU 849...but they haven't increased the speed at all, it's still 256 kbps....i know its 256 kbps upto 2 mbps but still, there should've been atleast some increment...called their cc today and told them about the speed problem, the lady at the other end said that it would be done within 1-2 days, lets c wat happens!
and yes, forgot to mention this, the site "register.mtnl.net.in" doesn't open most of the times...! tried firefox, IE, but still it takes a reallyyy long time....other mtnl sites are ok though..
and i was on 590 NU plan at that time, now i've switched to NU 849...but they haven't increased the speed at all, it's still 256 kbps....i know its 256 kbps upto 2 mbps but still, there should've been atleast some increment...called their cc today and told them about the speed problem, the lady at the other end said that it would be done within 1-2 days, lets c wat happens!and yes, forgot to mention this, the site "register.mtnl.net.in" doesn't open most of the times...! tried firefox, IE, but still it takes a reallyyy long time....other mtnl sites are ok though..asifpeshkar
Newbie
Guys, just a question. Im looking at the data from the original poster, if you can look at items 55, 56
55 08/09/07 08:02 PM 08/10/07 02:02 AM 161368390 52.46
56 08/10/07 02:02 AM 08/10/07 08:01 AM 373051708 1.87
Shouldn't the figures in bytes indicate something around 161 and 373 MBs?
55 08/09/07 08:02 PM 08/10/07 02:02 AM 161368390 52.46
56 08/10/07 02:02 AM 08/10/07 08:01 AM 373051708 1.87
Shouldn't the figures in bytes indicate something around 161 and 373 MBs?
asifpeshkar
Newbie
So does that mean, even if the statistics show 52.46 on the MTNL login page, the actual billing will be according to 161 MBs?Edit: Well, knura was charged an additional of 69/- so I am trying to forget about the 161 and 373 MBs. The billing calculations are using an entirely different logic.
