QUOTE(Sushubh @ May 3 2006, 12:33 PM) [snapback]50106[/snapback]
what if they are not owned by the governmetn and can actually take competitive decisions to challenge other private players and not supposed to pay for stupid schemes started by the governmetn to generate votes for their next elections!
they pay for the price we dont pay on petrol, diesel, kerosene and LPG.
[/b]
Compare that with Reliance... its selling Petrol/Diesel at nearly the same price (at least in Mumbai) and it does make a profit, have a look at BSE or NSE data submitted by reliance on petrochemicals.
Even for ONGC, its profit is 20% of revenue ($2bn profit with ~10bn revenue) while Exxon's margin is half of that (~ 10%).
My point is, even with load of subsidies 20% margin is not bad at all.
QUOTE(blr_p @ May 3 2006, 12:56 PM) [snapback]50110[/snapback]
AT&T is one of the baby bells, broken up from the big Bell telephone company. Who do you think paid for the initial roll out to the country decades ago, mostly subsidised by the govt. Also AT&T does not operate solely in the US, its a multinational. BSNL or VSNL AFAIK is mostly domestic.
[/b]
I agree that BSNL and AT&T at not playing at the same level.
My point was, I did not expect profit numbers of these companies to be in the same range and this fact was a welcome surprice.
BTW... these smaller bells are now operating as a single entity again.
Long story short, SBC acquired some of Bell companies, then acquired AT&T itself and change its own name to AT&T.
$101bn At&T as of now, is the biggest telecom company (with Verizon at close second at $96bn), based on yesterday's NYSE data.