mgcarley
Founder, Hayai Broadband
You are a vampiric isp.First you have already stated that you will do away with flat plans,which what canada isps have done and now you have the audacity to say that you will charge youtube.
I hope your hayani pops up like a dream ballon.You will do serious damage.Already aritel started the fup and now you want to start tiered internet.
your true colors are now showing.
You're an idiot. We have not done away with flat-rate plans - where and how did you come up with that idea? I have merely stated that we expect reasonable usage on our flat-rate plans, this is all. I think you'll find that this is a perfectly reasonable request, rather than coming up with a hard-cap FUP like other ISPs have, wouldn't you agree?
Furthermore, we will not be charging Youtube. I am merely stating that we would have the right to do so, unless they want to bring the content in via their own arrangements and then peer with us directly, otherwise we're footing the bill for their bandwidth - a cost which would be passed on to you, the consumer.
We will not be creating or taking part in any kind of tiered internet plan at all - in fact, my stance is quite the opposite: we want to start our own IXP so that all ISPs of India can exchange information freely without it being sent to Singapore or via expensive NIXI links.
HOWEVER, peering and content delivery are very separate businesses. Peers are generally expected to have traffic ratios of about 1:1 in : out - smaller ISPs in India tend towards about 3:1 in : out, however if any peer were to exceed the typical and internationally accepted ratios of 5:1 out : in, then they would no longer be a peer and by sending 5x as much traffic to a network as they receive, then they would be considered to be a content provider or delivery network, which would subject them to different rates. Considering everything, I doubt the rates charged to a content provider would be significantly different to those charged to a peer - a mere nominal difference to denote the type of relationship the two networks have - nothing like 3.7c/GB.
I should also point out that this is not just us, this is the situation at any peering exchange, and is written in to the peering policies of pretty much every ISP I've researched over the last 2 years.
Also, I don't know about this company "Hayani" that you've mentioned, but I can assure you that HAYAI aims to be #1 in customer service and value for money by providing the best services possible and the most reasonable prices we can, without comprimising on quality of service.
In future, I suggest you don't jump to conclusions so quickly and READ what was written. I use the words "in theory" for a reason. It's all hypothetical.
I hope your hayani pops up like a dream ballon.You will do serious damage.Already aritel started the fup and now you want to start tiered internet.
your true colors are now showing.
You're an idiot. We have not done away with flat-rate plans - where and how did you come up with that idea? I have merely stated that we expect reasonable usage on our flat-rate plans, this is all. I think you'll find that this is a perfectly reasonable request, rather than coming up with a hard-cap FUP like other ISPs have, wouldn't you agree?
Furthermore, we will not be charging Youtube. I am merely stating that we would have the right to do so, unless they want to bring the content in via their own arrangements and then peer with us directly, otherwise we're footing the bill for their bandwidth - a cost which would be passed on to you, the consumer.
We will not be creating or taking part in any kind of tiered internet plan at all - in fact, my stance is quite the opposite: we want to start our own IXP so that all ISPs of India can exchange information freely without it being sent to Singapore or via expensive NIXI links.
HOWEVER, peering and content delivery are very separate businesses. Peers are generally expected to have traffic ratios of about 1:1 in : out - smaller ISPs in India tend towards about 3:1 in : out, however if any peer were to exceed the typical and internationally accepted ratios of 5:1 out : in, then they would no longer be a peer and by sending 5x as much traffic to a network as they receive, then they would be considered to be a content provider or delivery network, which would subject them to different rates. Considering everything, I doubt the rates charged to a content provider would be significantly different to those charged to a peer - a mere nominal difference to denote the type of relationship the two networks have - nothing like 3.7c/GB.
I should also point out that this is not just us, this is the situation at any peering exchange, and is written in to the peering policies of pretty much every ISP I've researched over the last 2 years.
Also, I don't know about this company "Hayani" that you've mentioned, but I can assure you that HAYAI aims to be #1 in customer service and value for money by providing the best services possible and the most reasonable prices we can, without comprimising on quality of service.
In future, I suggest you don't jump to conclusions so quickly and READ what was written. I use the words "in theory" for a reason. It's all hypothetical.
getting popcorn hmm