I think torrent speed testing is right test for speed rather than any website. Not even I prefer testing on youtube if I see growing network of Google in India.
just wanted to make a point. instead of focusing on fastest broadband available to one home or a small locality, focus on fastest broadband that is available to more than just a few hundred of people living in a very limited area.
I don't understand why or which part... I merely stated you were using a bad analogy. So either you know something about my company that I don't, or you should consider an alternative.
Q. Is this speed available to all of these customers? Q. Is the speed consistent on all major web services (and not the ones that are locally cached by the company)? Q. Is this speed affordable to the comment web user?
Q. Is this speed available to all of these customers?
Well, cached servers are accessible to all the users so speed must be same for all (i myself have downloaded videos from youtube @ 2-3 mbps on 256 kbps connection )
Q. Is the speed consistent on all major web services (and not the ones that are locally cached by the company)?
Naturally speed is there coz of caching
Q. Is this speed affordable to the comment web user?
10 mbps for 20k must be affordable as they don't impose any FUP.
how is the locally cached content be compared to content that is not locally cached? i mean how can you compare speeds on content cached locally to speeds to regular web content? makes the whole point of 'fastest internet speed' irrelevant in my opinion.
This website uses affiliate links. This means that if you click on a link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission. This does not affect the price you pay for the product.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.