Google Android KitKat

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sushubh
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 743
  • Views Views 136,988
The thing is - I already had the free version registered with my phone. Now if just an OS update takes that right away from me, then thats not fair right?
 
Still android battery sucks compared to Nokia hardware. Not that Iam going to buy a Nokia smart phone.( budget Nokia dual sims phones around Rs 1500 are worth the money)ICS for old phones is not implemented fully (officially) because ICS 4.02 etc eats battery like Godzilla.Proud (Tired) owner of Galaxy Nexus,Nexus-S and Nexus One:sinister:
 
well we are yet to see how good Nokia devices are wrt battery life on windows phone. i do not think we have many people here who have purchased one. there was one user who was frustrated with his phone. he had all sorts of complaints with it.
 
FYI::
Awesome app that gives you 46 Mins. ($1)Calling for all over the world.(Incl.India)

As a leading telecommunications company in United States, Seawolf Technologies is dedicated to providing excellent global phone call service for all smart phone users with reasonable pricing plans.
With $1 balance as a free gift to start, you can use our GlobalTalk App to make call worldwide in a very simple way.

http://market.android.com/details?id=com.seawolftech.globaltalk
 
ZDNet has some good authors. But this has got to be the stupidest piece of junk ever in history.

While trying to catch up on my usual tech reading from last week, I stumbled on an excellent article from ExtremeTech titled “It’s time to start paying for Android updates.” The main argument is that Android users should pay a fee, say $10, to their carrier to get the next version of Android on their phone. The advantage of such a system is that carriers suddenly have an incentive to provide Android updates much more quickly to their customers. I think Google should be the one providing the incentive, not the consumer.

It's time Google starts paying for Android updates
 
Back