Lighting Up the Last Mile: Fibre Optics are the Way Forward

  • Thread starter Thread starter devx101
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 24
  • Views Views 4,266
Forbes buisness has come out with this story about India's BB woes and remedies.
It says Fiber is the way forward........but govt. is virtually sleeping till now...

Tata,reliance,bharti are u listening.....

Lighting Up the Last Mile: Fibre Optics are the Way Forward

:urock:

:)

NBP 2010 has a lot about Fiber to the Home projects. When/if they get implemented is another story though.

Why you think we're exclusively fiber only?
 
:)

NBP 2010 has a lot about Fiber to the Home projects. When/if they get implemented is another story though.

Why you think we're exclusively fiber only?

unable to understand the last sentence...
 
unable to understand the last sentence...

Well, with fiber being the future, it would be silly for us to build any copper in our network.
 
unable to understand the last sentence...

Well, with fiber being the future, it would be silly for us to build any copper in our network.

---------- Post added at 03:38 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:13 PM ----------

Hey mg and others i've found an alternative to fibres : Wireless Optical Networks: A New Alternative to Fiber

Did you see the date on the article? This is from 2000. It's hardly new. The technology is called Free Space Optics, and the current generation of equipment runs at up to 1.25Gbit/s, not 2.5 or 10Gbit/s as this article claims, and I've not found any commercially available equipment that supports DWDM at multi-gigabit speeds.

It's good for point-to-point only, so from the receiver we would have to run cables to the subscriber's premises. It's too expensive to give to individual subscribers since the units cost about US$20,000-30,000 each (1 for each side).

1.25Gbit/s would have to be split between a fairly large number of subscribers - probably 128 at the very least for it to come out with the same economics as fiber (assuming the system is in place for at least 5 years - that's a long wait), but the problem then is speed - we could only guarantee about 1/7th of what we can on fiber - it's still good, but not *as* good.

The main problem with actually implementing the system in Mumbai is that the rated distances are about 4km, but with the Mumbai air, smog, smoke and whatever else it's more likely to max out at about 1km - and naturally as with all wireless technology, the further the distance, the more the speed degrades - to achieve 1Gbit/s they recommend under 800m.

If you read back far enough, you'll find I was discussing this type of system back in 2009 as an alternative method of reaching certain parts of the city (such as Sion etc) in case the cablewalas choose to not let us lay cables, and it's something we still want to consider if we can't come to any other arrangement.

The good thing is though: no spectrum licenses to worry about. Etc etc. We'll probably give it a go, but it would have to be ultra stable - rivalling the Fiber - for us to go ahead and deploy it on a wide scale.
 
Well, with fiber being the future, it would be silly for us to build any copper in our network.

While that's obvious but we aren't seeing any investments in other/newer technologies (like fiber) from the telcos either.
The article says that existing telcos have stopped laying copper all together.
 
While that's obvious but we aren't seeing any investments in other/newer technologies (like fiber) from the telcos either.
The article says that existing telcos have stopped laying copper all together.

They are, just not much. Most of the copper being laid is in very short amounts - telco's are bringing fiber to the curb/neighbourhood and laying copper for the last few meters. This allows them to have very short loops for ADSL/VDSL deployment, which is an extremely good thing.

But then you still face the problem that none of them have good plans.

---------- Post added at 05:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:24 PM ----------

The article also confirms much of what I've been telling you guys for the last 2 years - but there are a few factual inaccuracies:

Twisted pair copper can easily carry ~100mbit/s with current VDSL technology and a sufficiently short loop
Metro-Ethernet can also carry 100mbit/s no problem
Co-AX can do up to about 300mbit/s with DOCSIS3.0 technology

...but fiber can outperform them all easily, so we're definitely heading in the right direction.
 
In my personal opinion i think India can only unleash a true BB revolution and solve its problem in the short/medium term with the help of CABLE Broadband.The reach of COAX is really remarkable in our country. The industry just needs consolidation and some big names to solve its technological problems.I think buying of Digicable by Reliance is a signal to that.
 
In my personal opinion i think India can only unleash a true BB revolution and solve its problem in the short/medium term with the help of CABLE Broadband.

The reach of COAX is really remarkable in our country. The industry just needs consolidation and some big names to solve its technological problems.

I think buying of Digicable by Reliance is a signal to that.

I don't entirely disagree. If a network is in place already, then by all means providers should be trying to maximize it's potential.

But if they're going to build anything new, fiber's the way to go forward.
 
:)

NBP 2010 has a lot about Fiber to the Home projects. When/if they get implemented is another story though.

Why you think we're exclusively fiber only?

Oh right, when/if Hayai gets implemented is another story though. :P

(I crack myself up, hyuk!)
 
Back