Netplus FTTH : User Experience

  • Thread starter Thread starter anubhav11
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 81
  • Views Views 23,428
Ever since I kept seeing ISP experience of many FTTH users here, i was very eager to try out the same but living in a small town has its own perks! Before this FTTH connection I had BSNL broadband (which was not very stable but kept as a backup for my buisness) and a local isp who provided wireless internet via 5Ghz unlicensed spectrum using AS134042(Maha Mediacom LLP). So they had a ubiquiti air grid m5 installed and the plan provided was 32Mbps Up and Down with no FUP @Rs.2000/- per month. The speed and service were all great but it wasn't FTTH😁.

Installation:-
One day got a call from my cable tv provider that they have started Netplus FTTH (AS133661) in my area, so after discussing i selected 1299 Plan which provided 150Mbps Unlimited and was told installation will be done in 2 days. But it took them 3 weeks for the installation (already a bad sign) and the reason for the same was that the LCO is only allowed to do the wiring part of the installation and the rest i.e. modem configuration will be done by the netplus engineer himself who 3 weeks to visit my place. Installation charges were Rs.3000/- and they gave a zte f660 GPON ont but as i knew the LCO i told him i wont be paying the installation until i test the service for around 1 week or so which he agreed.

IP Addresses:-
Netplus doesn't provide public IP addresses and hence its CGNAT but the main IP address keeps changing every day or two. I was not used to this as in my previous wireless connection i had static ip address without any extra charges. Also no IPv6 here.

Speeds:-
This is where I didnt like this ISP much. Speeds on local servers is okay okay but as soon as I download or test speed on international servers there is a big dip in speeds and pings are also not that great,even my wireless isp gives better pings and consistent speeds all around according to the plan. I get 100-120Mbps on local servers which is not that great as i have a 150Mbps connection (or am I asking too much). The netplus engineer also told that de have removed their servers from speedtest.net hence low speeds and they recommend speedtest.net.in to test speeds.

On Speedtest.net
9128969217.png
9128974568.png
9128992441.png


9128997700.png


Servers- Netplus Ludhiana, Airtel Delhi, Tata Sky Broadband Mumbai, ACT Chennai.

Now some international Servers

9129005296.png
9129014152.png
9129018363.png


Servers- Singtel Singapore, GTT London, New York AT&T

Fast.com
fast.webp

Netplus (AS133661) uses TATA, Airtel and Vodafone as their IP transit.

1.webp
2.webp
3.webp


Service:-
The service is ought to be poor because the lco don't have the authority to change or alter ont or olt settings, all technical work is restricted to the netplus engineer (who didn't even knew how to change the LAN IP addresses of the ONT😅). Even while installation i was the only one on that main fiber but was still getting -29dBm optical signal and the engineer didn't cared about it and after few days the LOS light started blinking 10-15 times a day. After complaining the engineer came after 3 days(knowing that the connection is being used for my business) and changed my connection to some other line and the signal was around -6dBm, but today its back to -27dBm. Also the downtime is very frequent (optical LOS). While writing this user experience the connection went down again!😠

The thing is i need help to decide whether to keep this connection or switch to Bsnl Fiber (launched here yesterday and the lco is very knowledgeable), ill be keeping my wireless connection active which soon will be upgraded to fiber but i need another connection for backup so either it will be netplus or Bsnl fiber.
 
Pretyy much small LCO based ISPs are no good if your usage goes beyond the sphere of Netflix,Youtube and some social media.

Anyplan over 50 Mbps are not worth subscribing from small ISPs( better look for data usage based plans from small guys)

Hence what @Realme said stands correct here. For your 150Mbps plan you are getting around 30-50Mbps because netplus only works good for peered services.
I have disconnected my netplus connection a week ago. But still for comparison here is my results for the same using AS134042 (Maha Mediacom LLP) fiber connection 50Mbps plan.
Screenshot_20200506-103609.webp Screenshot_20200506-103601.webp
 
@anubhav11 connect with wifi instead of lan and you will get full speed on international server too.

Here are mine with lan cable on PC. I have 50mb plan location Near punjab.

Local Server:
9393085915.png
9393089932.png


International Server:
9393092603.png
9393095436.png

9393098541.png
9393103094.png

9393106354.png

On the same new york server i get 47.5mb download and 55.8mb upload via wifi in my mobile. Via wifi i get full speed on almost all international server even my ping is above 300ms.
My speed on international server used to be like your but from last month i get good speed on international server too via lan cable too but still wifi has better speed on international server.

desk.PNG

meas.webp


DigitalOcean on mobile with wifi:
BLR1: 56.41mb dl, 15.8mb up ping 134ms
LON1: 10.34mb dl, 3mb up ping 370ms
NYC1: 5.32mb dl, 1.76mb up ping 446ms
AMS3: 10.97mb dl, 3mb up ping 343ms
SGP1: 46.61mb dl, 10.72mb ping 206ms

What is your location?
 
@raman07 i agree, but for me it was marginal difference till i had the connection. One thing i had observed is that speeds on 50Mbps netplus plan gets better overall speeds than 100+ Mbps plans. Now think of these same speeds you will be getting even when you are on 150Mbps plan. You are currently getting what you have paid for and the same is seen for neighbour as well. But it's not good when you get a higher speed plan and furthermore when i got this other fiber connection i tested both of them and netplus lagged behind. Another one of the major part of my discontent with netplus was my lco and netplus engineers.

My location is Kullu (Himachal Pradesh)
 
@anubhav11 connect with wifi instead of lan and you will get full speed on international server too.

Here are mine with lan cable on PC. I have 50mb plan location Near punjab.

Local Server:
9393085915.png
9393089932.png


International Server:
9393092603.png
9393095436.png

9393098541.png
9393103094.png

9393106354.png

On the same new york server i get 47.5mb download and 55.8mb upload via wifi in my mobile. Via wifi i get full speed on almost all international server even my ping is above 300ms.
My speed on international server used to be like your but from last month i get good speed on international server too via lan cable too but still wifi has better speed on international server.

View attachment 1577
View attachment 1578

DigitalOcean on mobile with wifi:
BLR1: 56.41mb dl, 15.8mb up ping 134ms
LON1: 10.34mb dl, 3mb up ping 370ms
NYC1: 5.32mb dl, 1.76mb up ping 446ms
AMS3: 10.97mb dl, 3mb up ping 343ms
SGP1: 46.61mb dl, 10.72mb ping 206ms

What is your location?
Why is your trace route to google.com having so many hops and the latency around 300?
 
Back