Samsung Galaxy Note 3

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sushubh
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 110
  • Views Views 16,189
GSMArena reviews Note 3...
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is the phablet benchmark for the competition to live up to - and a matching price tag is perhaps the only piece of bad news. On the other hand, without the advantage of the S Pen, rivals haven't got too many options - they just deliver as much horsepower as possible and the push screen size as far as they can and hope for the best. The first obvious casualty is the comfort of handling. And the irony of it is that a device like the Note, which clearly is supposed to keep both hands busy, is more compact and more optimized for single-handed use than its main rivals.

http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_note_3-review-996.php
 
It's been 6 months since I shifted to Samsung. Except the battery life, I regret everything else. Being on an AOSP/CM rom has helped a but though. Anyways bottom line is that enough Samshit for me.
 
I am beginning to resent Samshit even more.
Everyone knows that Adreno 330 (Snapdragon 800) is 20% faster than Mali T628 (Exynos)
Not to mention no LTE, no 4K recording and some more Snapdragon 800 exclusive features.
So we are given an inferior product with higher price.
I don't have any complaints about my Note 2. But Mali processors are always crappy and considered as budget.
Btw does Note 3 in India comes with Label that it can only be used in Asia or something?
 
Also the battery life on the Snapdragon processors are anyday better. And because Samsung never makes the sources for the Mali public, the kernels always lag behind the Snapdragon ones.
 
Back