The Offtopic Thread (Archive 1)

[amish]

Yes I mean what those guys were doing was more or less voyeurism purpose (may be upload on internet claiming them to be hidden camera pics). But as per above statement, law only considers that as crime if person is not clothed.
Anyway, here is interesting blog:
Surveillance in India and its Legalities
It says there is "Right to Privacy bill, 2011" in parliament. (Dont know if its already passed)

 

[Sushubh]

Right to Privacy Law in India It's a unicorn.

 

[Sushubh]

Unlimited Plans - MTNL Mumbai
new?

 

[x720]

Nope, revised a couple of months ago.

 

[Nishant]

I don't think it's new.

Sad to see that I'm paying 1445 for the plan which MTNL is giving for 850 :sad:

 

[Sushubh]

The Reliance plan I have, MTNL is charging Rs. 9999 (plus taxes) for it.

 

[Sushubh]

https://twitter.com/mtnlmumbai/status/479141033008037888
How the fuck did they hire decent social media guys?

 

[love90]

Having said that, if the guy's story is true, then the girl was also guilty (not by law) of provoking him. For some people, its difficult to keep quiet when they are provoked/rebuked. And this weakness leads them to trouble.

What?

The guy could have filed the case of obscene clothes if the attire was indeed vulgar

 

[Sushubh]

Since when did it become illegal to wear obscene cloths? Public nudity I understand but how do you define vulgar attire?

 

[mhsabir]

Provoking by words not the clothes. Some people cannot take harsh rebuke easily and his reaction of a lecture was due to her choice of words and tone and that's what I meant