like stated earlier in the post, mpeg 4 just offers more compression so can offer more channels compared to mpeg 2 , quality is no different from mpeg 2,
Sundth quality may be better because they have less channels and more transponders so they do not need to tightly compress the channels. So they hardly have to sacrifice quality.better quality = lower compressionhigher compression = lower quality
The picture quality between Mpeg-2 and Mpeg-4 is generally same but if you logically think about it then your answer will be negetive. As any compression of a file is always degenerated its quality. As our naked eye does not recognize it. Any raw mode of a file is generally uncompressed and has large file size. Compression is required for portability and nothing else. Remember compressed file has less details than uncompressed one. So Mpeg-2 is better than Mpeg-4 !
The bottom line is that the broadcaster can accomodate more channel in their transponders if they use MPEG4 tech than MPEG2 tech..........but the picture quality remains the same........
This website uses affiliate links. This means that if you click on a link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission. This does not affect the price you pay for the product.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.