I feel by now they must have prepared & circulated a draft of this letter, with date & personal details to be filled later, as the usage of this letter must have gone really high these days. So many peoples are kicking them out that these days, in some days there CCEs will have only one job left(filling the details in this type of draft) if they soon doesn't come up with better FUPs.
Their executives might be really happy by saving those 50-100 gbs (i.e. by lowering the limits from 100-200 Gb) which some 2-5 % of users might have downloaded, but they clearly doesn't understand the power of social media as marketing(good/bad). Not only that they are loosing the existing customer base but most of all they are loosing their prospective customers too heavily.
yeah should be Ready With Drafts!
Their executives might be really happy by saving those 50-100 gbs (i.e. by lowering the limits from 100-200 Gb) which some 2-5 % of users might have downloaded, but they clearly doesn't understand the power of social media as marketing(good/bad). Not only that they are loosing the existing customer base but most of all they are loosing their prospective customers too heavily.
yeah should be Ready With Drafts!
)
Btw, at my place I get 80 KBps if it's called '512 Kbps' and 140 KBps if it's called '1 Mbps'. 80 KBps UL is enough for my browsing needs while 140 KBps UL is enough for my downloading needs.I got a confirmation call and a service request no. for tariff plan migration couple of mins. later. This rep also confirmed the above mentioned speed and the NO FUP clause.@OP (formfollowsfunction): Sorry for hijacking your thread but our problems were very similar (rather almost same!) so I just posted in this thread instead of creating a new one! 
