I apologize for reviving this old thread, but I find it not so amusing listening to the people who are more concerned about the privacy rather than national security.
This thread reminds me of a lady, a social activist I met a few years back. She believed that it's important to educate prisoners who are serving sentences for for crimes like murder and rape so that they can have a better life after serving their time. But somehow, she found my suggestion not so interesting and my suggestion was that instead of educating the scum of the society try educating the kids who lost their parents while fighting terrorism. She was worried about the rehabilitation of rapists but men who are amputated while fighting for their nation and her own selfless ass is of no concern to her.
So, from what I have learned so far is that few individuals would prefer to keep privacy while some don't even know if they will live to see the next day. Kudos to you, as your privacy is worth some lives. Its really doesn't matter that some women and children end up being blown to bits and pieces as long as government don't about the stuff I talk to my girlfriend.
---------- Post added at 06:22 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:17 PM ----------
As for the gentleman who suggested that India should strike terror camps, again and again till they perish, seriously don't know a thing about military affairs. We are talking about striking a country with the sixth largest army in world and of course a few nuclear bombs, enough to destroy every city with the population of over a million.