Need Suggestion To purchase 18.5 inch LCD Monitor

[almon]

hey can anyone tell me the use of HD in 18 inch monitor..wouldnt it make sense in bigger screens > 32 inches.. displaying high res 1080p in smaller screens is wastage of money and resources I think...unless u have HDMI device in your house it doesnt make any sense
yup I just found it out but with led backlighting they look much beautiful

they are slimmer too.

 

[Sai]

Samsung P2370MS 23" Full HD , With built in speakers . Price 16k as per their site .

 

[Deleted member 13033]

Samsung P2370MS 23" Full HD , With built in speakers . Price 16k as per their site .

na this model suxs...

---------- Post added at 04:01 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:56 PM ----------

hey can anyone tell me the use of HD in 18 inch monitor..wouldnt it make sense in bigger screens > 32 inches.. displaying high res 1080p in smaller screens is wastage of money and resources I think...unless u have HDMI device in your house it doesnt make any sense


they are slimmer too.

LED backlighitng ones are definatley better...over the normal ones....

nd the guy who created the thread his budget is 10k he can get Acer G245H 24" fr under 12k full HD highest contrast ratio at 80000:1 pretty cool deal....

 

[manu1991]

hey can anyone tell me the use of HD in 18 inch monitor..wouldnt it make sense in bigger screens > 32 inches.. displaying high res 1080p in smaller screens is wastage of money and resources I think...unless u have HDMI device in your house it doesnt make any sense

AFAIK , there are no 18" Full HD monitors , atleast among the ones easily available . 22" is the minimum size in which you get HD monitors .

 

[auroraPWN]

yea as my friend karan explained quite clearly... i'll elaborate more... the older LCD panels use CCFL lighting to provide back panel lighting... the new TV's use LED's to provide back panel lighting what this means for you my friend is :
1. higher refresh rate
2. higher contrast ratio
3. lower energy consumption
4. deeper blacks and better colour reprodution


and if you want a 24" screen for a computer... drop the idea... its too big...

---------- Post added at 08:59 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:57 PM ----------

@anant.del..... the contrast ratio mentioned by the companies is not what it actually turns out... its much lower than that... sometimes..

---------- Post added at 09:02 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:59 PM ----------

@admin the future is IPS.... you can still have a IPS panel powered by a LED backlight... IPS panel's main advantage is now producers can break the LCD's 75hz refresh rate barrier and go upto 120Hz causing no-image tearing and more fluid video.

---------- Post added at 09:02 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:02 PM ----------

* or more than that in some cases

 

[Deleted member 13033]

yea as my friend karan explained quite clearly... i'll elaborate more... the older LCD panels use CCFL lighting to provide back panel lighting... the new TV's use LED's to provide back panel lighting what this means for you my friend is :
1. higher refresh rate
2. higher contrast ratio
3. lower energy consumption
4. deeper blacks and better colour reprodution


and if you want a 24" screen for a computer... drop the idea... its too big...

---------- Post added at 08:59 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:57 PM ----------

@anant.del..... the contrast ratio mentioned by the companies is not what it actually turns out... its much lower than that... sometimes..

---------- Post added at 09:02 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:59 PM ----------

@admin the future is IPS.... you can still have a IPS panel powered by a LED backlight... IPS panel's main advantage is now producers can break the LCD's 75hz refresh rate barrier and go upto 120Hz causing no-image tearing and more fluid video.

---------- Post added at 09:02 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:02 PM ----------

* or more than that in some cases

lol....when it has ever been told by co. fully that u will get xtly what they have written anyways all these 3 monitors have been tested that I have mentioned have and performed extremity well in various tests done by websites and close to their actual result.....

plus who told u IPS monitors can only get 60+......there are TN monitor doing it aswell......IPS might be better though but u need to have atleast 25k-30k to buy the cheapest IPL monitor.......

 

[sufi]

IPS panels have more lag compared with TN panels. Latter are recommended for gaming, former for image quality.If you can get a 22-24" then theres nothing like it. FullHD makes a difference when you are watching movies or sitcoms. 1920x1080 will soon become the de-facto standard for screen resolution and will remain for a couple of years.BenQ LG Viewsonic are decent. Samsung seems overpriced here. Ive had an excellent experience with Dell.Deltapage.comPrimeABGB.comSMCinternational.comMediahome.inTheitwares.comCall these places up if you want the exact prices as they fluctuate.

 

[raj1402]

Best monitor below 10k isCompany Name DellModel Name ST2210WPrice 9.8kFeatures Full HD 1920 1080HDMI supportDisplay color 16millionscontrast ratio 50000:1Dell ST2210W 22Inch LCD Monitor-HDMIFull HD 1920 1080HDMI supportDisplay color 16millionscontrast ratio 50000:1just compare the above features if you get anything better than this then go for that!!!

 

[Deleted member 13033]

Dell dont include dvi cables u need to buy them separately....with Acer they hav included hdmi dvi and other cables too under 10-12 k

 

[sufi]

I got the DVI with my Dell. Maybe you got gypped.