and the truth is bing does not change much. what they are claiming is what wolframalpha is doing. google can already do most of what bing claims to be doing and more. the only think that bing does better is probably product and travel booking search.
wolframalpha is good for instant summary for stuff but it doesnt give detail. that is when u need links to further info. wikipedia is better in that sense. it has summary/detail and external links.
but wikipedia cannot compute in real time also... wikipedia data is not trustworthy (it's not perfect)...i have seen wolfram retrieving data from the wikipedia but i guess they tend to rely on more dependable resources.
Wolfram Alpha is way different than both Google and Bing , the kind of scientific and mathematical tools it has is mind blowing , i mean you enter a compund's formula and you get the 3D Structure , name ,weight blah blah blah , normally , i would have to scourge through 10-15 web pages and then sift out this info , which i know would have directly as a pdf . But say i want the phone number of ABC Tours and Travels , i wont get it on Wolfram
exactly but how many ppl wud do complex tasks? that too online?wrt computing, wolframalpha wud be best for those who actually know, how to make use of it.
This website uses affiliate links. This means that if you click on a link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission. This does not affect the price you pay for the product.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.