If media would have been working independently in India, they Killings and roiting of kashmiri pundits would have never been crushed
This is overblown i only ever read about it on the net. How does the pandits story even compare to what we did to the muslims in Kashmir, or Sikhs or any of the other insurgency wracked areas of the country. You have no clue, do you. Do these people exist or not.
I have no clue either. I only get to find out from foriegn reports. Its not pretty. Insurgency is not pretty. When we give our forces the protection of AFSPA, they can detain or dissapear anybody on the slightest pretext without those people having any recourse to the law. Areas where AFSPA is in force are defacto police states.
Having said it i'm not in favour of lifting AFSPA in Kashmir because then everything we achieved will go back to square one. Its a pretty fcuked up situation in Kashmir
Back to the topic..
For about ten days, the Government of India’s Department of Advertising and Visual Publicity stopped advertisements to this newspaper.
It was only for ten days. How often does the govt advertise usually in the DNA ? anybody know
For a government to temporarily halt such ads to a mass-circulating metro-based newspaper like DNA is unusual.
i see
We wondered whether or not it was linked to DNA’s dropping the Edit page, but a responsible and reliable official assured us that such was not the case.
Why did DNA drop the 'edit' page ? after the front page thats the next section i look for in a newspaper ie its heart.
Discreet inquiries with the minister’s office led us to believe the government stopped the ads for a limited time to, well, to teach DNA a lesson.
And that's all we know.
And then, during a general chat about the newspaper, she came to the point: she said that DNA ought to look at its coverage over the past few weeks and introspect.
So i suppose this is the clincher then.
The prime minister’s media advisor has privately accused DNA of an agenda against the government, and its Editor-in-Chief of being close to a political party in the opposition.
How interesting. I wonder whether the Pioneer got the same treatment too. Its editor-in -chief is a BJP RS member.
So is there a trend here or just a one off ? Is it just because of AH coverage or something else.
Its an odd situation and not too clear to me.
This is overblown i only ever read about it on the net. How does the pandits story even compare to what we did to the muslims in Kashmir, or Sikhs or any of the other insurgency wracked areas of the country. You have no clue, do you. Do these people exist or not.
I have no clue either. I only get to find out from foriegn reports. Its not pretty. Insurgency is not pretty. When we give our forces the protection of AFSPA, they can detain or dissapear anybody on the slightest pretext without those people having any recourse to the law. Areas where AFSPA is in force are defacto police states.
Having said it i'm not in favour of lifting AFSPA in Kashmir because then everything we achieved will go back to square one. Its a pretty fcuked up situation in Kashmir
Back to the topic..
For about ten days, the Government of India’s Department of Advertising and Visual Publicity stopped advertisements to this newspaper.
It was only for ten days. How often does the govt advertise usually in the DNA ? anybody know
For a government to temporarily halt such ads to a mass-circulating metro-based newspaper like DNA is unusual.
i see
We wondered whether or not it was linked to DNA’s dropping the Edit page, but a responsible and reliable official assured us that such was not the case.
Why did DNA drop the 'edit' page ? after the front page thats the next section i look for in a newspaper ie its heart.
Discreet inquiries with the minister’s office led us to believe the government stopped the ads for a limited time to, well, to teach DNA a lesson.
And that's all we know.
And then, during a general chat about the newspaper, she came to the point: she said that DNA ought to look at its coverage over the past few weeks and introspect.
So i suppose this is the clincher then.
The prime minister’s media advisor has privately accused DNA of an agenda against the government, and its Editor-in-Chief of being close to a political party in the opposition.
How interesting. I wonder whether the Pioneer got the same treatment too. Its editor-in -chief is a BJP RS member.
So is there a trend here or just a one off ? Is it just because of AH coverage or something else.
Its an odd situation and not too clear to me.