The Offtopic Thread (Archive 1)

  • Thread starter Thread starter vikikivi
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 9,994
  • Views Views 1,361,337
Status
Not open for further replies.
The law is ambiguous and hence it leaves the law enforcement and sometimes the moral police to decide as per their views
 
BTW. After almost 2 years of using IPB. I found out that the keyboard shortcut for opening up the link popup is Control+L. It is usually Control+K in word processing apps.
 
mhsabir said:
Provoking by words not the clothes. Some people cannot take harsh rebuke easily and his reaction of a lecture was due to her choice of words and tone and that's what I meant
Can you tell me what would have been appropriate response from girl side the very 1st time she opened her mouth?
 
chromaniac said:
Since when did it become illegal to wear obscene cloths? Public nudity I understand but how do you define vulgar attire?
Try that telling to the friend of mhsabir :)

It's ironical that his friend was doing moral policing exactly....... Is there anything more to say?
 
chromaniac said:
https://twitter.com/mtnlmumbai/status/479141033008037888
How the f**k did they hire decent social media guys?

Yep me too surprised at such a proper / polite / acceptable reply! :D
chromaniac said:

Nope plans were launched a while back.
But I think I am enjoying their old plan! (now closed)
DSL-Unlimited_Combo_550 which offers this: Day (7am to 6pm) : 768Kbps, evening (6pm to 12am) : 1Mbps & night (12am to 7am) : 2Mbps
So you can download @2mbps as much as you want during night time. Good speeds evening time and OK speed day time!
600Rs and includes landline rent!!
NO FUP!!
 
mhsabir said:
And also mind you, this was in Chennai 10 years ago, which would probably be like 20 years or so ago in other metros (the way the cultural aspects have changed over years).

I dont remember the entire conversation and anyway it was hearsay from cousin. The way the cousin described the guy it must have been polite and if the girl had replied get lost politely, he would have turned away. But the girl had rebuked him strongly.

Basically, had the girl said "aap apna kaam kijiye" maybe he would have kept quiet. But the girl probably used "Tu kaun hota hai mujhe yeh bolne wala", and that might have hurt his ego a bit.

The guy was at fault. But my point is that he was being stupid, but was booked under eve teasing & thats the only point I make.
I already pointed out the difference that may have resulted in him ultimately getting jailed.

No denying that what he did was stupid. And he should have not bothered. Problem is that the girls' behaviour would now result in him not even coming forward to help others when needed.
 
Also he is not even my friend. I don't even know his name. Nor have met him. He was just a friend of my elder cousin, who in turn happened to tell me the story of why he had to go to the police station to rescue his friend
 
mhsabir said:
The law is ambiguous and hence it leaves the law enforcement and sometimes the moral police to decide as per their views
This!!!

and by the time you get acquitted by the court(if you do somehow..) you'd have suffered so much that you'd think twice before clicking any pic,even your own.forget about if its illegal or not.
this is the state of law and judiciary in our country.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back