Can you tell me what would have been appropriate response from girl side the very 1st time she opened her mouth?mhsabir said:Provoking by words not the clothes. Some people cannot take harsh rebuke easily and his reaction of a lecture was due to her choice of words and tone and that's what I meant
Try that telling to the friend of mhsabirchromaniac said:Since when did it become illegal to wear obscene cloths? Public nudity I understand but how do you define vulgar attire?
chromaniac said:https://twitter.com/mtnlmumbai/status/479141033008037888
How the f**k did they hire decent social media guys?
chromaniac said:
I already pointed out the difference that may have resulted in him ultimately getting jailed.mhsabir said:And also mind you, this was in Chennai 10 years ago, which would probably be like 20 years or so ago in other metros (the way the cultural aspects have changed over years).
I dont remember the entire conversation and anyway it was hearsay from cousin. The way the cousin described the guy it must have been polite and if the girl had replied get lost politely, he would have turned away. But the girl had rebuked him strongly.
Basically, had the girl said "aap apna kaam kijiye" maybe he would have kept quiet. But the girl probably used "Tu kaun hota hai mujhe yeh bolne wala", and that might have hurt his ego a bit.
The guy was at fault. But my point is that he was being stupid, but was booked under eve teasing & thats the only point I make.
This!!!mhsabir said:The law is ambiguous and hence it leaves the law enforcement and sometimes the moral police to decide as per their views