Jonathan Ive: Apple is not in the business of making money

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sushubh
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 51
  • Views Views 6,274
kickass said:
i m amazed ppl r actually defending such ridiculous patents !! a rectangular phone, a slider etc. This is a complete abuse of the patent system. patents shud only be granted for actual R&D or innovations. this is retarded shit. a patent for a rectangle phone ?? seriously WTF !!! wat do they expect ppl to do ?? make triangular phones?
any1 who actually is defending such patents is a delusional moron. you can argue all u want but it doesn't change the fact that Apple is abusing the patent system by patenting utter crapshit.
Since I'm a delusional moron, could you please help me find the patent which says "A rectangular phone" or "A slider"? May be its my idiocy but I just couldn't find any stupid patent like the one you claimed.. Oh and when you find it, please spend a bit more time and give it a whole read. Thanks!

mhsabir said:
@IMNS - As I was telling Hardik7, some people just cant take sarcasm seriously, I as very well aware that you probably did not see my response. And I very well know that Apple Fanboys cannot simply sit quiet.

No offence, I don't think you understand the meaning of sarcasm. Look it up again please. Google is your friend....

Everybody uses chinese shit & we all know it, but what I find wrong with Apple is that they speak as if they are so philanthropic, they do not have profits as a priority & all that nonsense.
Who's feeding you this nonsense? No one at apple would (or does) say apple is a philanthropic company. If anything, up until Steve Jobs death apple was something you could easily claim as anti-philanthropic. Please stop making baseless assumptions.

Apple doesn't claim to do good with people. They only say that their approach is to make the best products possible. How does that even make apple sound like philanthropical is something beyond me.

And yes, profits isn't a priority at apple. At this point of time you'd think that's a load of BS coz first, they are making billions every quarter, and second, even if they make profits a non-priority now, it won't matter coz they don't really need to make money for years thanks to their huge bank balance. But that's not the case. When Jobs came back to apple in the late 90s apple was all but bankrupt. A couple more bad years and apple might have had to close shop even. Even at that point of time Steve had his focus on making great products than making money. That's what Jobs taught apple. Make great products and everything else will follow. Not sure why you guys are finding it that hard to believe. Think those misconceptions about apple claiming itself as philanthropic are to blame? Coz otherwise everything else makes sense to me.


Take an example, I am asking you, if you gave a work contract & if you found that children under 14 are being employed to do hard labour? What would you do? Would you say - Not my problem? I did not ask them to? Even if you are making lots of profit? No, on the contrary I would make sure that the contract is cancelled or modified to make sure children are not employed for the task.
I don't know what's up with these misconceptions. Employing children under 14 is illegal. Do you think what's happening in foxconn factories is illegal? Why are you comparing it to something illegal then? Which part of foxconn's operation is illegal which you want apple to stick its neck in?

Foxconn employs 100s of 1000s of workers. Did someone force all those workers to work in foxconn? Fact is, working in Foxconn pays better than most other opportunities these people have. And from what I've learned from various news reports, most of them work only for a few years, collect enough money to get started with some land for farming (or something else) and leave Foxconn. They even want to work overtime so they can earn more money quickly and go on their way sooner. No one forces them for overtime. I can understand people living in developed countries not understanding why these people work the long hours for such little pay. But you yourself live in a similar developing country. Do you not know how hard it is to make a living here? Lemme assure you if Indian labour had an option to work for Foxconn (ie the same pay and work conditions), a huge majority of them would be willing coz it's a hell lot better than their current jobs. Work condition in a lot of Chinese industries/sectors is really bad but Foxconn isn't one of them. Please educate yourself about the issue first before a point out of it. I know it's not all roses and pink but it's still a lot better than your average Chinese/Indian factory.


All I am saying to Apple & its folks is - stop pretending about delivering products only through innovation , we only care about people not profit etc nonsense.
Again, you made that part up about apple claiming to be philanthropic. Or making products "only" through innovation and no inspiration from outside world. What you assume is your problem, not apple's, to solve.

I have learnt long ago that sarcasm is usually wasted on Apple Fanboys
Or maybe it's the fact that you don't know what sarcasm is and have been using it incorrectly as you did here?

And I remember reading about releasing only after things are perfect, if that was so, why are patches & updates (not cosmetic) are even released by them.
It's their goal to make the best and most perfect products possible. No one at apple claims they are always and 100% successful or whatever product they created can't be improved upon. Once again your problem with apple is your assumption and misinterpretation instead of it being a real problem.

After 6 years of staying the forum, I dont want to get banned now for the 1st time, so I will just just up on the language comprehension part.
I assume you meant "just give up" here? In which case, please feel free to let me know if I misread or misunderstood something. Why do you think that would get you banned? You don't need to say "that's not what I meant a**hole". Everything can be discussed in a civilised manner (the opposite is true too of course).

But, you are quoting a paragraph, in which I have listed concerns of them claiming to be a company which has "ONLY" good intent for people & if they happen to make money thats good. Well, they are making TONS of MONEY, but I still feel they can do more in terms of making sure people who work at such factories are helped as much as possible. Other companies are equally bad or worse. But, atleast they dont go around making such sweet sounding noises. Now I dont know why you have replied saying no compromising on design to my THAT concern by quoting THAT
6 years and 5000 posts, hmm, do you not know how forum quotes and replies work? Or did I have it wrong all this while? Here's my understanding of it. When you reply to someone specifically in a thread, you either address them or quote their post and write your response below the quote. Some people post their response first and then quote the post below it. Which is also acceptable if not the correct way to do it, as long as your post ends after that quote. If you don't quote anyone, it's assumed to be a response to the OP or the general discussion in the thread. It is pointless to re-quote the OP everytime someone responds to it (unless you are only responding to a specific part of OP). Not sure why you assumed the part of my post ABOVE your quote was a response to you. First part was my response to your quote is exactly (IMO) where it should be, ie below the quote. Lemme know if I had been doing it wrong all this while...

Now, coming to no compromise to design part - I am not saying they make horrible products, I am not saying they make the best products, they are making decent products, which many people are liking - fair enough. Even I would consider buying an Apple product. But, the compromise on design part - According to me, they are selling the "illusion" that its a wonderful product & the best that is possible , and that EVERYTHING ELSE is a cheap imitation & a not worthy of existence.
Again, they don't claim to be the best. They claim their goal is to make the best products instead of making something which they don't think is great (hence the iPad instead of a touchscreen MacBook). And if you think your product is the best, would you not also believe rest are not as good (otherwise your belief of having the best product would be contradicted by your own beliefs... Beliefception!) ? And where did they claim each and every smartphone is an imitation (let alone cheap imitation)? Please stop making assumptions and presenting them Astarte and reason for apple hate.

Also, according to me they are overcharging and making insane profits, whereas they are neither making them more labour friendly, neither consumer friendly by pricing it fairly. You might be a buying a good product, but they are making you pay more for an illusion of a perfect product.
So are you trying to tell me that my 6 year long experience with iBook & MacBook and the time I spent with the 2G iPhone and the iPad was an illusion? When I thought these were working great for me was not real? Are you claiming I'm a brain dead zombie who doesn't even know if something is working for him and if it was worth his (hard earned mind you) money? No one thinks any product is perfect. Everyone has different needs and whatever fulfils most of them is as good as perfect for them. If I had never used a mac, windows XP would be the the best OS for me. If there was no win7, win XP would still be the best OS out there and still neither are perfect nor would anyone say so even if they were the best options at the time in their own opinion. Again you're making up the assumption that apple users think their product is perfect. Its the best product which they thought they could buy with their budget. Who are you to tell them they are idiots? Do you think all these people are living in a vacuum where they don't even know there are cheaper products available out there? Do you think all of them are dumb enough to just shell out for every apple product without even thinking about the alternatives? Who do you really think these people are who pay for apple products? People with the mind of a 6 year old? Who somehow managed to make enough money in this cut-throat world to pay extra for an apple device?

Please stop judging other people. Or atleast stop judging them based on their tech choice. As much as you'd like to believe "Apple Fanboys" and "Apple Sheep" are brain dead, it's far from the truth. I like apple products and I still believe a mac is way better than windows (that might change with win8 though) and iOS was way better than android up until ICS and jelly bean. But I have never said or believed that people buying non-apple products are delusional. They have different needs and as long as they knew about their options, they are as smart as me and you. To claim that someone fell for some (life long) illusion because of which they keep buying products from a same company is the most delusional comment IMO. But that's just my opinion. Maybe you actually are a psychic and know for real that millions of people (including yours truly) are delusional? In which case, my apologies for wasting your time which could have been better used solving world peace and hunger and other major issues using you exceptional capabilities!

And Btw, a huge freakin thank you for the aircel 3GS deal heads up. I was looking for a cheap android phone but nothing worse than Galaxy Nexus was getting me interested and even that was quite a but more than I'm comfortable spending on a phone. But atleast it had jellybea. Even then I had to wait for someone to make a trip to US to pick one up for me. And it won't even have local warranty. 13k for new 3GS (especially with that free 3G data deal!) is a really good value for money IMO. Gonna confirm a few things first though (an "Apple Fanboy" who isnt going to just blindly buy an apple product?!?!? Blasphemy! Right? What has the world come to....). Thanks Again :)
 
lol

@IMNS - Can't blame you, someone was posting random stuff & admin deleted his posts & now it looks like my last posts are directed to you, especially the quote paragraph part which led you to spending your valuable time explaining me how forums work & all. Anyway, forget it.

I am a bit bored of all this & yes you can say, I say give up or whatever you want to call it.
And yes, I need to spend hours learning about Steve jobs (who just happened to say good artists copy and great artists steal or whatever)...

On a side note, not speaking on his behalf (kickass) , I have not read much about the rectangular thing & all . But this is one article which talks something about what Apple wants Samsung that made me shake my head..

http://www.pcworld.com/article/245493/apple_to_samsung_dont_make_thin_or_rectangular_tablets_or_smartphones.html

The Design Alternatives

In section 2-40 and 2-41 of the redacted public legal brief (pdf), Apple offers alternative smartphone designs Samsung could have used instead:

Front surfaces that are not black or clear
Front surfaces that are not rectangular, not flat, and without rounded corners
Display screens that are more square than rectangular or not rectangular at all
Display screens that are not centered on the front surface of the phone and that have substantial lateral borders
Speaker openings that are not horizontal slots with rounded ends and that are not centered above the display screen
Front surfaces that contain substantial adornment
Phones without bezels at all or very different-looking bezels that are not thin, uniform, and with an inwardly sloping profile

The tablet alternatives Apple felt Samsung should have explored are similar:

Overall shapes that are not rectangular with four flat sides or that do not have four rounded corners
Front surfaces that are not completely flat or clear and that have substantial adornment
Thick frames rather than a thin rim around the front surface
Profiles that are not thin
A cluttered appearance


Again, if you say this is just a blog & Apple never said so.. Fine with me..

I never have ever used or will use unparliamentary language & never likely will. So you can pretty much knock off whatever you thought I would tell you/call you about the "give up" part..whatever.

But yeah, forget it .. about other stuff I said as well...
 
lol

@IMNS - Can't blame you, someone was posting random stuff & admin deleted his posts & now it looks like my last posts are directed to you, especially the quote paragraph part which led you to spending your valuable time explaining me how forums work & all. Anyway, forget it.

Damn you. This is why you should quote or atleast address the person you are replying to, unless it's the OP! I want those five minutes of my life back now!!

I am a bit bored of all this & yes you can say, I say give up or whatever you want to call it.
And yes, I need to spend hours learning about Steve jobs (who just happened to say good artists copy and great artists steal or whatever)...

You actually should. The man was one of a kind genius. And a douchebag too. Doesn't get any more interesting than that!

On a serious note, please stop making assumptions. I don't care if you say you give up or not. My goal here is not to win the interwebz war. I'm just discussing things and presenting my opinion which I dont believe is perfect and undebatable. Also, learning more about Jobs is not a bad idea. Especially if you are going to post his quotes without any context and understanding (how his mind worked) of the man.

On a side note, not speaking on his behalf (kickass) , I have not read much about the rectangular thing & all . But this is one article which talks something about what Apple wants Samsung that made me shake my head..

Apple to Samsung: Don't Make Thin or Rectangular Tablets or Smartphones | PCWorld

Again, if you say this is just a blog & Apple never said so.. Fine with me..
Here's the thing. People hear or read what they want to. The PC world writer (like most of you) has already decided that apple is an evil company. So s/he made it sound as if apple wants Samsung to design phones which aren't rectangular and thin and have non-black disproportionate bezels and uncluttered front and non-rounded corners. While I read it as apple's response to Samsung's claim that there isn't really another way to design a modern smartphone. The PC world writer makes it sound like apple wants ALL those changes in Samsung's phone, whereas apple is just saying these are some of the ways Samsung could have designed the phone had it not intended to make its phone look like an iPhone. It could have been a thin smartphone with rectangular screen and apple wouldn't have objected if the rest of the things weren't similar. Or some other combination of changes and similarities. But the fact that it has so many similarities with iPhone is what makes Apple believe Samsung copied the iPhone instead of coming up with their own design.

If the PC world writer was not biased, he would have quoted and responded to the very next part of the litigation too. ie 2-43. Here it is...

The availability of so many different design choices confirms my opinion that any alleged function assigned to the individual Apple design elements called out by Mr. Sherman is not essential to the use of a tablet computer or smartphone and could not have dictated the particular design of these elements of the Apple iPhone and D’889 tablet design"

Which clearly indicates that apple isn't asking Samsung to change everything they pointed out in the litigation. Only a few differences would have been good enough to make the Samsung phone not resemble the iPhone so much. I refuse to believe the writer didn't read this part. It was right there, on the very same page and yet s/he ignored it completely. This is the kind of biased (or incompetent/clueless) reporting which makes people think apple patented a rectangle phone and now wants to stop everyone who tries to create a rectangle phone. Being a rectangle is only a description in the iPhone design patent. It's not The patent. If apple believes someone infringed their design patent, they are obviously going to point out it being a rectangle as a similarity, along with everything else. Quite a bit different than apple claiming something is a copy simply coz its a rectangle.


I never have ever used or will use unparliamentary language & never likely will. So you can pretty much knock off whatever you thought I would tell you/call you about the "give up" part..whatever.

Didn't you just say that you weren't responding to me in that second post? So doesn't that make this comment moot? You are responding to my response to your response which you already pointed out was not a response to me?
(Responception!)
 
I was just following forum rules :|

https://broadband.forum/news-feedback/116-disclaimer-privacy-policy-rules-regulations/#post504

Also! Just to keep the database size sane... Let's not quote posts which are already at the last of the thread...

Meanwhile, I will not try to claim I follow rules always, but I have read & try to follow as I remember them. You can talk to Sushubh, if you have any suggestions.

Now, coming back

I was simply trying to say that even if I had pointed that posts at you, I would "still" not use that kind of a language - Thats all.

And thats another of the reason why I dont want to get into this discussion because I notice and in "my" opinion, you seem to take all posts & respond as if directed at you, personally, rather than at the majority or atleast a huge chunk of Apple users. Also, a lot of things are not explicitly said but implied. And if you want me to find a press release where Apple says we intend to do philanthropic work , then yes, I cant find it.

But, they say our goal is good to make best and perfect products as possible. Fine, for whom . Is it Dogs? As in popular meme for Samsung 3 which said "phone for humans" and the meme says - "I thought it was for my dog" .No, its for humans, in other words they say - they want us humans to have the best of experience, in other words - it is for humanity & humanity is philanthropy . They say Profits are not that important, then, you should make them affordable by not charging wayyyy above & make huge profits - Price them so that more people can get it (Mind you, not at a loss) . And they make limited models, which helps reduce cost even further.

And you say you get the great performance..Fair enough, at the same time, I have many friends are not that happy, some are too dumb to know the difference between iPhone & android & blackberry & for them they buy it because its an iphone (Well, if you dont have an iphone....you dont have an iphone). My point about illusion is targetted precisely at these folks, who fall for these advertisements & in my personal opinion are a HUGE chunk of the idevice buyers. Having said that, I would still say that in my opinion that even anyone else who is buying Apple products, especially in the mobile segment, is paying a premium or atleast something more than it deserves.

And my example about kids under 14 etc, I am not questioning what they are doing is legal or not, I just took it as an example of right & wrong. And I said, other companies are doing worse. Also, I have read a few stories online, of how people are being forced to work for more hours.. And for a company that is already making so much profits, it was a duty to make sure they have enough guidelines to make sure that good work ethics that they project are maintained. It is not a question of legal or illegal - It was a question of moral right.

Again, I once again want to walk out of this conversation, simply because we will not agree to a huge majority of things, and I find spending my energy on an endless discussion is useless.

P.S - Feel free to give concluding comments, but dont expect me to come back & respond to those, simply because it would only result in a loop.
 
Again, I once again want to walk out of this conversation, simply because we will not agree..

That settles it then...


Btw, just realised aircel doesn't have 3G in Delhi so it won't be as good a deal as I thought it'd be. Not sure if I'm going to get it now :/
 
Even in non 3G circles, they have a decent mins + sms plan , and you can check if it will be locked to Aircel, otherwise you can give that sim to a family number, who can use a good plan for 6 months and you can use the phone.
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIFdBp8rbtA&feature=player_embeddedonce upon a time he had hair :D
 
Back