Mahesh Murthy posted a pretty solid post on this issue on
Google Plus...
He instead went on the Congress (I) mouthpiece channel NDTV and said what he was really worried about was pornographic religious imagery. Wow, such concern! (
Never asked for pre-screened online content: Sibal to NDTV ). He said “There were some demeaning, degrading, clearly pornographic depictions of gods and goddesses”. This seemed reasonable on the surface, but only till you look deeper.
Sibal was proved to be a liar a second time too within minutes.
Google’s own transparency report (
India – Google Transparency Report) showed that the Government, so apparently concerned about all this apparent religious hate imagery had not asked through official channels for those to be taken down. Of 358 specific requests for content takedowns, only 3 referred to items about religious hate and those were removed. The vast majority were about politics and politicians, including 255 pieces of content classified as “government criticism” and those, in keeping with Google’s published policy, were not removed. All of those are visible today too.
Further, and Sibal knows this, as his department drove for the creation of our IT Act, religious hate speech and pornography are already illegal under our Cyber Laws: do refer to Sections 66 and 67 here: (
http://www.mit.gov.in/sites/upload_files/dit/files/downloads/itact2000/it_amendment_act2008.pdf) These sections have already been used to take down illegal material online in the past.
Indeed, what the websites said was that they would always comply with Indian law, if there was a law and court order. But of course, that doesn’t suit Mr. Sibal - being a lawyer himself he knows criticism is not a ground a court can issue an order on. The law does not see “government criticism” as illegal. What Sibal wants is extra-judicial powers. Beware - that's exactly what Berlusconi wanted. And Hitler too.