MTNL Broadband: 8mbps Plans

  • Thread starter Thread starter Atul
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 1,949
  • Views Views 264,075
You could be on the alcatel system, perhaps?
In any case here is the tracert to 74.125.226.196
traceroute to 74.125.226.196 (74.125.226.196), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets1 www.asusnetwork.net (192.168.2.1) 1.417 ms 2.083 ms 2.078 ms2 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 4.102 ms 4.114 ms 4.107 ms3 triband-mum-59.184.191.254.mtnl.net.in (59.184.191.254) 9.461 ms 10.584 ms 11.352 ms4 static-mum-59.185.4.41.mtnl.net.in (59.185.4.41) 18.228 ms 20.499 ms 20.518 ms5 74.125.51.205 (74.125.51.205) 20.501 ms 20.795 ms 21.263 ms6 72.14.232.202 (72.14.232.202) 24.158 ms 23.654 ms 11.223 ms7 66.249.94.39 (66.249.94.39) 38.861 ms 72.14.232.100 (72.14.232.100) 36.248 ms 66.249.94.39 (66.249.94.39) 41.199 ms8 66.249.94.72 (66.249.94.72) 73.813 ms 72.14.239.20 (72.14.239.20) 77.995 ms 66.249.94.72 (66.249.94.72) 80.992 ms9 66.249.94.92 (66.249.94.92) 142.728 ms 146.542 ms 147.078 ms10 209.85.250.229 (209.85.250.229) 242.372 ms 244.834 ms 223.030 ms11 72.14.238.130 (72.14.238.130) 239.967 ms 240.424 ms 240.381 ms12 209.85.250.127 (209.85.250.127) 224.970 ms 225.311 ms 229.970 ms13 209.85.241.42 (209.85.241.42) 301.304 ms 72.14.239.208 (72.14.239.208) 280.137 ms 270.296 ms14 72.14.232.70 (72.14.232.70) 302.070 ms 278.863 ms 280.475 ms15 66.249.95.231 (66.249.95.231) 290.544 ms 72.14.235.10 (72.14.235.10) 292.545 ms 66.249.95.231 (66.249.95.231) 293.138 ms16 216.239.49.165 (216.239.49.165) 293.093 ms 296.579 ms 216.239.49.85 (216.239.49.85) 294.225 ms17 lga15s28-in-f4.1e100.net (74.125.226.196) 291.575 ms 296.417 ms 291.553 msPing to Google India:
Code: 
PING google.com (173.194.36.2) 56(84) bytes of data.64 bytes from bom04s01-in-f2.1e100.net (173.194.36.2): icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 time=7.43 ms64 bytes from bom04s01-in-f2.1e100.net (173.194.36.2): icmp_seq=2 ttl=55 time=7.95 ms64 bytes from bom04s01-in-f2.1e100.net (173.194.36.2): icmp_seq=3 ttl=55 time=7.09 ms64 bytes from bom04s01-in-f2.1e100.net (173.194.36.2): icmp_seq=4 ttl=55 time=7.06 ms64 bytes from bom04s01-in-f2.1e100.net (173.194.36.2): icmp_seq=5 ttl=55 time=7.41 ms64 bytes from bom04s01-in-f2.1e100.net (173.194.36.2): icmp_seq=6 ttl=55 time=7.12 ms64 bytes from bom04s01-in-f2.1e100.net (173.194.36.2): icmp_seq=7 ttl=55 time=7.45 ms64 bytes from bom04s01-in-f2.1e100.net (173.194.36.2): icmp_seq=8 ttl=55 time=7.53 ms64 bytes from bom04s01-in-f2.1e100.net (173.194.36.2): icmp_seq=9 ttl=55 time=7.79 ms
 
Definitely looks like I am on a different port than yours :(. Any tips on how to convince MTNL to change my connection to the SOTL port? I don't live in South Bombay and would rather not take a trip to Prabhadevi :P
 
sanke1 said:
I really don't know what it stands for. But it is one of the system which handles ADSL connections.
MTNL has different gateways which handle ADSL.
1. SOTL 120.XX.XX IP series (The best series. People have reported only good browsing experience including me)
2. Alcatel (old) 59.XX.XX IP series (Timeout problem)
3. Alcatel (New) 182.56.XX IP series (Timeout problem)
4. Ericsson 59.XX.XX IP series (Unconfirmed whether there is a timeout problem or not) Might explain why some guys on 59.XX series do not have timeout problem.
The Alcatel Old and New are the ones with timeout problem. But heard some rumor that yesterday's downtime was to fix the Alcatel gateways. (Might not be true and may be a general fault causing downtime)
If you are on those troubled IP series, then keep an eye on timeouts and report here.
@enkay
You need a new line. Period.
Click to expand...
Yes I do need a new line and ready to buy one. I am just trying to figure out what part needs to be replaced.
Btw, I am on the 120.x series.
Anyone able to solve the "Blank page" problem when you try to view your usage on http://crestelreg.mtnl.net.in:10080/jsp/Login.jsp ?
Meanwhile, I did have much lesser attentuation (37 compared to the old 49) with my DSL-2750U. Connection is also quite stable and seems snappy. But for some reason it takes long to sync the first time, and syncs only at G.dmt. Also works naked only (i.e. not behind a splitter).
 
enkay said:
Yes I do need a new line and ready to buy one. I am just trying to figure out what part needs to be replaced.
Btw, I am on the 120.x series.
Anyone able to solve the "Blank page" problem when you try to view your usage on http://crestelreg.mtnl.net.in:10080/jsp/Login.jsp ?
Meanwhile, I did have much lesser attentuation (37 compared to the old 49) with my DSL-2750U. Connection is also quite stable and seems snappy. But for some reason it takes long to sync the first time, and syncs only at G.dmt. Also works naked only (i.e. not behind a splitter).
Click to expand...
Did you get a new modem?
DSL-2750U has a setting hidden deep under advanced options which allows you to change ADSL modulation to Annex M. You need to change that setting manually. Only select Annex M and leave other options unchecked. Then see if it is connecting and remaining stable. Otherwise revert to G.dmt
Usage page comes up blank too. Some website coding must have broken. But since our port speeds are in place, I am sure the data is getting counted and will be accounted for. The only day our data was not counting was on that maintenance day. You could download at full profile speed and VDSL guys on 20-30 Mbps profile must have had a blast.
 
sanke1 said:
Did you get a new modem?
DSL-2750U has a setting hidden deep under advanced options which allows you to change ADSL modulation to Annex M. You need to change that setting manually. Only select Annex M and leave other options unchecked. Then see if it is connecting and remaining stable. Otherwise revert to G.dmt

Usage page comes up blank too. Some website coding must have broken. But since our port speeds are in place, I am sure the data is getting counted and will be accounted for. The only day our data was not counting was on that maintenance day. You could download at full profile speed and VDSL guys on 20-30 Mbps profile must have had a blast.
Click to expand...
Just borrowed a DSL 2750 for testing. Wanted to see if attenuation was any different.

Will try Annex M as you said, just by itself.
 

Similar threads

P
Airtel 100GB 8mbps plans in Kolkata
Replies
1
Views
2,733
Siddharth Anand
A
BSNL Introduces 8Mbps plans
Replies
4
Views
2,352
Amuthan
A
BSNL Introduces 8Mbps plans
2
Replies
15
Views
5,682
neevarp
U
MTNL Mumbai 8Mbps Plan Customers
2 3
Replies
20
Views
4,958
insane79
Back