Quad9 DNS Service: 9.9.9.9

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sushubh
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 46
  • Views Views 9,345
@swapneelp Looks like it doesn't leave BSNL's network for some reason. 🤷‍♂️

Code:
root@bumblebee:~# mtr -w -z 9.9.9.9
Start: 2020-04-22T00:36:12+0530
HOST: bumblebee.varkey.io                        Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
  1. AS9829   static.bb.ill.59.92.184.1.bsnl.in   0.0%    10    2.2   2.2   1.9   2.5   0.2
  2. AS9829   218.248.167.198                     0.0%    10    3.6   2.9   1.9   3.9   0.6
  3. AS9829   218.248.255.5                      30.0%    10    3.4   3.1   2.5   3.8   0.4
  4. AS9829   218.248.255.6                      80.0%    10    3.1   3.5   3.1   4.0   0.6
  5. AS9829   117.216.202.210                    70.0%    10   79.4  53.7  40.8  79.4  22.2
@Not a TXT record
  6. AS???    ???                                100.0    10    0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
root@bumblebee:~#
 
Since when Quad9 got an Indian server? Last time I used the nearest server was in Singapore.


Source

Edit: They had a Bombay server earlier but it was only for peered ISPs.
Edit2: For a sec I thought I had DNS Leak but I tried few other DNS providers and they were working fine.
 
Quad9 has presence in Kolkata as well, IIFON DC in Kolkata has them as a peer, getting good latency to them with Alliance but not sure if should switch from Cloudflare.
 
@HC1337 Their website only shows one location of server inside India which is at Bombay.


It's good that they have peered with more ISPs here in India. Wish they had peering with Excitel in Delhi.
Edit: I think I talked to Quad9 support last year about some routing issue (which turned out was a issue on my ISP's side), they were very helpful. That's when they said they are trying to increase presence in India.
 
I will share the traceroute when I head back to my college, after a week to be precise.
I am certain IIFON dc in Kolkata was in the trace.
 
It has indian server in MUM now.
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=0 ttl=59 time=32.450 ms


64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=59 time=32.817 ms


64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=59 time=31.923 ms


64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=59 time=31.737 ms


64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=59 time=32.334 ms


64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=5 ttl=59 time=32.625 ms


64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=6 ttl=59 time=32.274 ms


64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=7 ttl=59 time=33.191 ms


64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=8 ttl=59 time=31.929 ms


64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=9 ttl=59 time=32.118 ms
 
Back