...We all know how these speedtests can vary between servers....
This gives the company a chance of evading the slow speed issue by using various reasons from it depends on the site , traffic at the server at the moment n all...
They shld have shown actual websites being browsed or even downloads from reliable http servers to highlight the poor connection...
There shld have been a more indept analysis of the whole situation....
They have a 3-5 minute capsule within which they have to fit in all the facts and fiction. Maybe they should have done a little more. But can't expect too much from them.
Regarding surfing speeds, speed tests etc., TRAI itself is at fault. It says every ISP should provide a method to verify speed. The ISPs provide one - within India. This, however does not consider the traffic jam (or deliberate throttling) at the international gateway. It is similar to specifying that a clear path should be provided from the flat to the society main gate, but does not say not clarifying on what the person should do if a wall is erected beyond the gate. Absolutely senseless stuff, this.
The only thing really verifiable is the downtime, which CNN-IBN seem to have done. Don't know what the next step in this case is.