srikanthmsp
Newbie
hmmm i had a diff may be its due ur airtel (u get good speed so u cant get th e diff) i see it really on my f**kin sifyBROADBAND connection
[/quote]My situation is pretty much the same - agree with every word there!Originally posted by Sushubh@Apr 2 2005, 11:19 AM
heh. i got hooked to opera coz I HAD SIFY! Opera shines on slow connections. Especially when I can disable images on the fly. The best setting on opera is the cached image mode on...[snapback]7470[/snapback]
[/quote]Opera worked even better than great, on a 486 with 32 MB RAM. It stayed within limits and was extremely fast all through my 3 years on that machine.Originally posted by Sushubh@Nov 6 2004, 01:15 AM
Try K-Meleon but I have heard Opera works great even on a Pentium 200.[snapback]1623[/snapback]
[/quote]Firefox is sick.Originally posted by power@Dec 19 2004, 05:49 PM
Opera and ffox both slows down performance (takes f**kin ram)
Ie though unsecure is fastest i loading up bcoz it is halfly started with windows[snapback]3389[/snapback]
[/quote]Again, IE and opera load times were quite similar as I said above. And if the performance I saw on THAT config is not good..... then well nothing else can be for you!Originally posted by power@Dec 20 2004, 01:59 AM
I didnt mean abt stability they are very stable i mean if u use on slow pc's like some 64 mb ram then ie opens in very less times though ffox and opera both requires more ram compared to it [snapback]3443[/snapback]
[/quote]Yup, it keeps surfed pages in memory and still is as fast as lightning and its memory usage is less than what IE would use despite its in-memory caching.Originally posted by Sushubh@Dec 20 2004, 02:22 AM
i know about opera. you can tell it to take less ram.
one of the best feature about opera is that it keeps all the pages surfed in a session in ram. that is why when using back key, the result are instanteneous.
you have to make a compromise somewhere. IE back/forward button is pathetic. so is firefox's.[snapback]3447[/snapback]