This is so sad...SSV charging 3k extra when they are the largest partner of fivenet...why fivenet not doing anything about this? and why SSV is so keen to keep there child (24 online)alive?? if they want they may but why penalizing us users. Now they also charge 50 Rs. extra for DC++ (which they earlier used to deny existance )
SSV has the right to charge certain fees, that is, the 3k - how do you expect them to pay for their infrastructure?
Secondly, 24Online is a client/server system that any ISP can use - it monitors the flow of traffic for the purposes of accounting (and thus, billing, where applicable).
Though the extra Rs50 fee for DC++ is a bit much, I do understand it to a point: they probably are buying 100mbit/s or 1Gbit/s lines between Fivenet's CO in Sion and themselves, rather than having dark fibre (which is very expensive).
As such, they have limited overall capacity to work with and so you're basically buying the right to use a bit more of the capacity which they've purchasd.