elepton said:
The main problem is not being able to see what I've just written -- there's very little feedback. I never have a problem signing with pen and paper but signing on the
tablet didn't work out for me. I suggest you have some trials with the tablet signature thing before deploying it in production.
Duly noted. Maybe we can have a pen & paper optional version for those that specifically request it.
elepton said:
Will each and every receipt (including those with payments made in cash to a representative) be available online for printing? That would be just great.
Your account would be reflected as having been topped up at a certain date/time, so it would be available perhaps in some kind of mini-statement format with the basic details including the unique transaction number or whatever... that's kind of the point of these machines
elepton said:
Thanks, I didn't know that they are very sensitive to the heat they are exposed to.
That's how they print.
elepton said:
Indeed.
elepton said:
Decent purposes feels a bit ambiguous.
Decent in this context means moral.
elepton said:
So I'm required to pay by some due date even if I don't receive the bill by that due date?
It would only apply if you were on a post-paid data plan, in which case I think a short grace period should be allowed. Other plans are prepaid anyway, so... it would be like if you didn't top up your mobile.
elepton said:
Let the law of the land deal with it; the ISP is just a messenger and thus should not be liable for whatever goes through it's networks because of direct actions of it's customers. In other words, what is the need for the above bit?
Ass coverage on our part.
elepton said:
I thought the law already mandated that.
As above.
elepton said:
And what when the subscriber wants to modify the contract? AFAIK, Both the parties have equal rights to modifying a contract.
Correct. If the either party wants to modify the contract then they may do so if the modifications are legal and if both parties agree to the contract. If both parties don't agree to the contract then the contract becomes nullified and we would no longer be obligated to provide you services (and you would no longer be obligated to pay us).
Pretty much all of the T&C that are raised here are basically spelling out each party's obligations as it relates to existing and relevant Indian laws (that is, the
DoT license and for example criminal law, retail services, consumer guarantees etc)... in short you have to pay for services rendered and you agree to use them in a legal way. We have to provide you the services we're supposed to provide as a broadband operator.
elepton said:
So if I want to disconnect the connection I have to give *thirty days* notice?
I think someone already brought that one up. I think the TRAI now mandates 7 days.
elepton said:
As if Hayai is liable to the subscriber for any delay or failure in providing the service even if the same is in direct control of Hayai.
What it means is, let's say Airtel's international cable gets cut, then we can't be held liable because it's not our responsibility to fix it. If one of our cables gets cut, then it *is* our responsibility to fix.
elepton said:
Act of God, attack by aliens, an EMP attack by state enemies, cyber warfare, cyber attacks (including but not limited to DoS attacks, DDoS attacks and SQL injection attacks), what not.
Something like that. Things we can MAYBE mitigate if we hired Jeff Goldblum as some kind of resident nerd, but otherwise can't necessarily prevent.
elepton said:
What obligations and restrictions on the subscriber? Why would anything except dues and equipment returns survive the termination of this contract?
If this contract were terminated then irrespective of whether it's replaced by a new contract which you may or may not accept the terms contained therein or not, that doesn't mean you could magically then hold us liable for something.
Further to that, unless a clause is specifically changed to remove a condition (such as VOIP maybe becoming less prohibited in the near future) then it means all other T&C survive the contract, including for example, if you decided to take a defamation suit (or one was filed against you) because we had, by being an ISP, made it possible for one person to defame another... I know it's unlikely, but in reality this is pretty much a standard clause in many contracts I've seen and was directly stolen from the existing ISP's contract.
elepton said:
It would be best if the customers were informed of such changes 30 days or at least 7 days in advance and that the same be in the contract agreed upon by both the parties.
I think 90 days - on the assumption that we also get 90 days notice of a change in law (the most likely thing to modify a contract), otherwise the maximum time that is humanly possible.
elepton said:
I can only confirm if some information is true and correct *to the best of my knowledge or belief* -- I am not a super being.
Basically you're confirming your name/address/phone/etc are all correct: would you knowingly sign a contract with wrong details on it?
Once I nearly got on to a plane with tickets issued to someone else. I'd even gone through passport control with that same boarding pass and nobody had noticed the completely different names. Amazing lack of security at Auckland airport. But in that case, who would have been liable? The airline for giving me an incorrect boarding pass or me for not checking it before getting on an international flight? Surprise surprise, probably would have been me - fraudulent acquisition of property, misrepresentation or any number of things.