MTNL Broadband: 8mbps Plans

  • Thread starter Thread starter Atul
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 1,949
  • Views Views 264,094
I'm so frustrated with crappy connection reliability, thinking of changing to hathaway Hi speed connection they're offering in South Mumbai. 1799 for 3months for 10gb fup @ stated 50mbps download speeds. Even if its half the speed and stable, beats the crap out of mtnl.
 
shethsa said:
1799 for 3months for 10gb fup @ stated 50mbps download speeds. Even if its half the speed and stable, beats the crap out of mtnl.
How is tht better?........ 50Mbps & 10GB FUP......... lol....... we r having trouble keeping below 85GB on 8Mbps.........
U need to fix ur line or router or whtever is causing stability issues...... yes.... it does take time...... a few trips to xchg..... but lot better than hitting 10GB FUP on 1st day of the month :playful: ........
 
panzer008 said:
How is tht better?........ 50Mbps & 10GB FUP......... lol....... we r having trouble keeping below 85GB on 8Mbps.........
U need to fix ur line or router or whtever is causing stability issues...... yes.... it does take time...... a few trips to xchg..... but lot better than hitting 10GB FUP on 1st day of the month :playful: ........

Lol I have blazed past 10 GB in 2 days.
 
True I on 1 mbps end up using 8-10 gb on Bsnl uld 800 plan in 2-3 days before being fuped to 512 kbps for the rest of the month . Will have a hard time controlling on such blazing speeds. But damn Bsnl is the only option I have got, don't know if they'll ever increase their speeds, morons :rolleyes:
 
I have minimal data needs (probably 8-10gb) right now. Let's see how hathaway pans out. Current user feedback suggests about 48mbps download speeds.
 


sanke1 said:
Lol I have blazed past 10 GB in 2 days.
yea...... even I hav done 14.6GB so far in 2 days....... need to calm my nerves after the 3 day FUP ordeal.....
 
Lol WTF is this?
Code:
C:Windowssystem32> tracert google.comTracing route to google.com [173.194.112.2]over a maximum of 30 hops:  1
 
lol. Reminds me of BSNL's routing :D
Fine here.
Code:
PING google.com (173.194.36.2) 56(84) bytes of data.64 bytes from bom04s01-in-f2.1e100.net (173.194.36.2): icmp_seq=1 ttl=58 time=6.68 ms64 bytes from bom04s01-in-f2.1e100.net (173.194.36.2): icmp_seq=2 ttl=58 time=6.60 ms64 bytes from bom04s01-in-f2.1e100.net (173.194.36.2): icmp_seq=3 ttl=58 time=6.20 ms64 bytes from bom04s01-in-f2.1e100.net (173.194.36.2): icmp_seq=4 ttl=58 time=6.60 ms64 bytes from bom04s01-in-f2.1e100.net (173.194.36.2): icmp_seq=5 ttl=58 time=6.94 ms
 
For testing purposes, I managed to hook up an old ADSL 2+ Modem (Beetel 110TC1) to my naked setup (with a correct adapter this time), and I seem to be getting much better values. Does the line still look faulty to you guys?
There is a marginal improvement in the SNR both up and down.
 

Back