Section 377

[whoru007]

Reminds us how backward India is

Nope my friend, India is not backward, some of people ruling this country and assholes cheering these are.

 

[goodburner]

Nope my friend, India is not backward, some of people ruling this country and a*****es cheering these are.

These political parties are just mirroring the opinions of the people. I wonder how many people in India are aware of a concept of Homosexuality? 25%?

 

[whoru007]

These political parties are just mirroring the opinions of the people. I wonder how many people in India are aware of a concept of Homosexuality? 25%?

No they aren't mirroring the opinions of the people, instead they force their agenda on the people and make them to believe it. Otherwise who are they to comment on anyone's personal choice; everyone has equal right and on can express personal opinion but not harming or acting against someone. I believe 100% of people (at an appropriate age) are aware of a concept of Homosexuality if they are aware of concept of having sex. If somebody likes having sex with opposite gender then there are others who loves do it in opposite way. Gay/Lesbian word may be foreign to them but concept is mostly understood, they may not like it pr deny it because either they have been taught so or told to do so.

 

[Sushubh]

Is it Hindu to be homophobic? — timesofindia.indiatimes.com — Readability

 

[dejan]

Next thing the SC will do is ban porn

 

[Sushubh]

I thought they had already banned porn
The Dubious Arguments for India’s Ban on Gay Sex — www.newyorker.com — Readability

Amarendra Sharan, the lawyer for the Delhi Commission for the Protection of Child Rights, argued that only sex between a man and a woman was “natural,” because it has the possibility of procreation. “Any penetration of the sexual organ” that does not, he continued, “will be against the order of nature.” Sharan was asked by the judges about the meaning of “carnal” and “penetration,” and read from a 1969 case that defined “carnal intercourse” as “the temporary visitation of an organization” by the penis, “where the primary object was to obtain euphoria, and where the visiting member was partially enveloped by the organization.” On that basis, Sharan argued, even mutual masturbation should be considered both “unnatural” and penetrative, and disallowed under Section 377.

I wonder if they are going to ban condoms next.

 

---

[Navjot Singh]

Reminds me of the movie Demolition Man. I am sure if this continues, India will pretty soon have a future like that. Its scary.

 

[genie]

Ban sex....problem solved

 

[Sushubh]

Lovely India this... We are defending laws Brits forced on us.

 

[dextermorgan]

Ban sex....problem solved

Even population will be controlled and there will be no rapes. Its a win-win for us! ............../s