Not exactly... Long story short, the thinking is more along the lines of it being a transitional product while we buy out & rearrange/rebuild/rewire their networks/replace equipment.
Why would we do this? In short, buying a network allows us immediate coverage and the ability to generate revenue from those areas from day-1. On the other hand, building out an area in full could take months.
So by buying out a network, not only do we have immediate coverage of the area, we can then over a period of several months tidy it up and replace components as manpower allows us to, and also, maintenance becomes our responsibility. As such, we can determine where the trouble-spots are and fix them sooner, thereby improving coverage for that set of customers.
On the other hand, while using a cablewala would *technically* be an option to anyone almost anywhere (in Mumbai, at least, maybe other cities too), we would only be able to deliver 100mbit/s service on most of those networks, and we could not guarantee any quality of service. If it goes down, it goes down and it has nothing to do with us.
The problem from our side is that *we* would almost certainly be the ones who end up getting the blame for the outage, moreover, it would probably lead in some cases to that whole "blame-game" that tends to go on - they say we're down, we say they're down and still nobody is willing to fix anything. Some people may be prepared to deal with that, but they shouldn't have to, and we pretty much wouldn't want them to.
as i could not infer much from the paragraph... i guess you wanted to say that it is almost certain that we will 'not go' through cablewallah route.
But at the same time you will be buying some networks..-so which networks, the crappy network which the cablewallah made(which includes the last mile as well as backbone fiber).