These are not tech standards since its much more then technology that decides quality.
Much of it comes from Business decisions. TV Broadcasters have to decide how much to spend on digitizing non-live feed and how much bandwidth to be purchased etc etc.
Most of good quality encoding is manual, editors have to choose key frames manually and adjust frames to keep playback smooth [e.g without square blocks in action scenes].
That costs $$$. So the solution is to use automatic encoding where you pop edited footage into some system and out comes MPEGed feed. And compress it to max possible extent to save on satellite costs.
To save money, most production houses in India [there are exceptions] do not consider spending anything on DVD/TV authoring.
Where can I find out what SHOULD be the output ?
HQV - Hollywood Quality Video Processing for HD : Benchmark DVD
Much of it comes from Business decisions. TV Broadcasters have to decide how much to spend on digitizing non-live feed and how much bandwidth to be purchased etc etc.
Most of good quality encoding is manual, editors have to choose key frames manually and adjust frames to keep playback smooth [e.g without square blocks in action scenes].
That costs $$$. So the solution is to use automatic encoding where you pop edited footage into some system and out comes MPEGed feed. And compress it to max possible extent to save on satellite costs.
To save money, most production houses in India [there are exceptions] do not consider spending anything on DVD/TV authoring.
Where can I find out what SHOULD be the output ?
HQV - Hollywood Quality Video Processing for HD : Benchmark DVD