mgcarley
Founder, Hayai Broadband
This article could be the result after the ISP connecting TOI's office leased line internet with FUP. Only then they show light on these issues. :notallowed:
@MgCarley: I agree your point... in that case for a 2mbps u/l it must be aroung 250-350 GB limit.
I have four friends who have MTNL connections.
All four in different areas of the city.
One of them is okay with once a week downtime.But others suffer disconnections for days on end.Literally.I dont have any agenda against MTNL so I dont have a reason to lie either.Customer support is mostly unreachable and when they are they are usually no help.
I had the conenction four years ago and was disconnected for two weeks without help despite contacting CC multiple times.Gave up and shifted to Airtel.
They may be cheats and I despise them for many reasons.But service quality is at a whole different level compared to MTNL.
It IS the case of MTNL working well in some areas and pretty poor in most of the others.
Atleast three other friends of mine have shifted from MTNL in the past two years.
Reliable?Hardly.
Proving my point yet again. Thanks for your input MTNL on the whole may be sufficiently good in some areas, so, maybe instead of using the world "unreliable" to describe MTNL's service, maybe we need to say "inconsistant".
Good article. I'm glad to see that finally the press has highlighted the issue. I see Airtel is mentioned only once. Airtel sucks should be mentioned 100 times. They are the ones who have introduced this FUP shit in India. Other players followed Airtel. I'm OK with any FUP - but the FUP limit has to be FAIR - it's totally unfair in Airtel's case.
Couple of month's ago, I had written a big fat email to Airtel's corporate office. I got a call from their Pune office. Some lady explained me why they have introduced this FUP shit and what it means to the consumer. I heard everything she had to say and in the end I just asked her one final question: Why is Airtel's FUP unfair? I mean we are talking about 15GB and 25GB FUPs not 100GB or 200GB. She didn't have an answer to this question. So, the conclusion is they won't give a **** unless their profits start dropping substantially.
The bad news: I'm on a 20GB FUP plan. The good news: FUP is applicable only during day-time and not during night-time. I say many old Airtel broadband subscribers (like me) are still getting a much better deal than new Airtel broadband subscribers who are stuck with a 15GB-25GB FUP limit. That's all I have to say.
@Admin: Try emailing to various newspapers and see if anyone else is interested in publishing this kinda article.
---------- Post added at 02:37 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:28 PM ----------
Twitter / Chaitanya Purandare: FUP limits are totally unf ...
Obviously not as much of a highlight as is really needed. I understand that they only have limited space, but so much information was left out (including even any remote suggestion of what needs to be done and who to complain to, information/suggestions which I do distinctly remember providing, and have also left as a comment on the online version of the article which has yet to be moderated).
looks like this article was published only in the New Delhi TOI edition,nothing mentioned in the Bangalore edition.
You can see said article online at Caught in the Net of slow broadband - The Times of India
@MgCarley: I agree your point... in that case for a 2mbps u/l it must be aroung 250-350 GB limit.
I have four friends who have MTNL connections.
All four in different areas of the city.
One of them is okay with once a week downtime.But others suffer disconnections for days on end.Literally.I dont have any agenda against MTNL so I dont have a reason to lie either.Customer support is mostly unreachable and when they are they are usually no help.
I had the conenction four years ago and was disconnected for two weeks without help despite contacting CC multiple times.Gave up and shifted to Airtel.
They may be cheats and I despise them for many reasons.But service quality is at a whole different level compared to MTNL.
It IS the case of MTNL working well in some areas and pretty poor in most of the others.
Atleast three other friends of mine have shifted from MTNL in the past two years.
Reliable?Hardly.
Proving my point yet again. Thanks for your input MTNL on the whole may be sufficiently good in some areas, so, maybe instead of using the world "unreliable" to describe MTNL's service, maybe we need to say "inconsistant".
Good article. I'm glad to see that finally the press has highlighted the issue. I see Airtel is mentioned only once. Airtel sucks should be mentioned 100 times. They are the ones who have introduced this FUP shit in India. Other players followed Airtel. I'm OK with any FUP - but the FUP limit has to be FAIR - it's totally unfair in Airtel's case.
Couple of month's ago, I had written a big fat email to Airtel's corporate office. I got a call from their Pune office. Some lady explained me why they have introduced this FUP shit and what it means to the consumer. I heard everything she had to say and in the end I just asked her one final question: Why is Airtel's FUP unfair? I mean we are talking about 15GB and 25GB FUPs not 100GB or 200GB. She didn't have an answer to this question. So, the conclusion is they won't give a **** unless their profits start dropping substantially.
The bad news: I'm on a 20GB FUP plan. The good news: FUP is applicable only during day-time and not during night-time. I say many old Airtel broadband subscribers (like me) are still getting a much better deal than new Airtel broadband subscribers who are stuck with a 15GB-25GB FUP limit. That's all I have to say.
@Admin: Try emailing to various newspapers and see if anyone else is interested in publishing this kinda article.
---------- Post added at 02:37 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:28 PM ----------
Twitter / Chaitanya Purandare: FUP limits are totally unf ...
Obviously not as much of a highlight as is really needed. I understand that they only have limited space, but so much information was left out (including even any remote suggestion of what needs to be done and who to complain to, information/suggestions which I do distinctly remember providing, and have also left as a comment on the online version of the article which has yet to be moderated).
looks like this article was published only in the New Delhi TOI edition,nothing mentioned in the Bangalore edition.
You can see said article online at Caught in the Net of slow broadband - The Times of India