time up, its 10:40AM. please verify ur teams at:
Google Docs - superselector
Google Docs - superselector
-
Amazon Deals - ToS - Like us?
Super Selector - India tour of Australia
- Thread starter ~Hami~
- Start date
- Replies 296
- Views 33,552
sneezymelon
NetZombie
my subsies for sehwag and zaheer-Rudra Pratap Singh : 50Brett Lee : 145am I allowed to substitute now?scores of both are still < 50my new team would be-Sachin Tendulkar: 150Sourav Ganguly : 135Matthew Hayden: 140Phil Jaques : 40Andrew Symonds : 55Stuart Clark : 50Anil Kumble : 140Brad Hogg : 40Mitchell Johnson : 35Rudra Pratap Singh : 50Brett Lee : 145Total: 980
From next match we can have following rules for substitute:
1) Absolute weightage difference for substitue and substituted player can not be > 30
2) Substituted player shud NOT have scored MORE THAN 50 points by the time substitution is made.
10 mins left to 10:30, server time seems to be abt 8-9min late.
see,
in the beginning itself i told, rules followed by espn is computerised... here we follow simple easy additions...
there is no need for implementing new rules... it will really confuse... substitutions should be made for the player who is not playing the game...
1) Absolute weightage difference for substitue and substituted player can not be > 30
2) Substituted player shud NOT have scored MORE THAN 50 points by the time substitution is made.
10 mins left to 10:30, server time seems to be abt 8-9min late.
see,
in the beginning itself i told, rules followed by espn is computerised... here we follow simple easy additions...
there is no need for implementing new rules... it will really confuse... substitutions should be made for the player who is not playing the game...
@sneezymelonwell u r declaring players after day1 has ended. and cards are pretty open now. u may have a reason for declaring late but it wud not be fair if u include bowlers who has already taken max wkts and another bowler who has already scored 30 runs and bound to take 3-4 wkts tomorrow.also score of < 50 proposal is for next test.plus i just realised that when i said score of < 50, i was thinking 20 pts per wkt (because ESPN has that). so max toleration i was assuming 2wkts. but here we have 10pts per wkt so max toleration can be 20 to 30 that may be decided b4 next test by all of us.
see,
in the beginning itself i told, rules followed by espn is computerised... here we follow simple easy additions...
there is no need for implementing new rules... it will really confuse... substitutions should be made for the player who is not playing the game...
well as i already said and it practically happened, this rule leaves a room. i can select 5 players who obviously WUD NOT be playing. and then wait till 10:30 AM IST on first day and select bowlers and batsmen who performed well on that day so as to maximize my score.
in the beginning itself i told, rules followed by espn is computerised... here we follow simple easy additions...
there is no need for implementing new rules... it will really confuse... substitutions should be made for the player who is not playing the game...
well as i already said and it practically happened, this rule leaves a room. i can select 5 players who obviously WUD NOT be playing. and then wait till 10:30 AM IST on first day and select bowlers and batsmen who performed well on that day so as to maximize my score.
yup even i wanted to pick rp singh for sehwag
the rule should be that you can pick only a bowler for a bowler and a batsman for a batsman
and btw many teams dont have a keeper which is compulsory in espn rules , we need to have more well defined rules
the rule bowler replacement for bowler, batsman for batsman is good
but there is no compulsion that every team should have a keeper... i ve already gifted that in the rules...
well as i already said and it practically happened, this rule leaves a room. i can select 5 players who obviously WUD NOT be playing. and then wait till 10:30 AM IST on first day and select bowlers and batsmen who performed well on that day so as to maximize my score.
ok... whats ur solution for it...
give a detailed line up of rules
we can discuss it...
the rule should be that you can pick only a bowler for a bowler and a batsman for a batsman
and btw many teams dont have a keeper which is compulsory in espn rules , we need to have more well defined rules
the rule bowler replacement for bowler, batsman for batsman is good
but there is no compulsion that every team should have a keeper... i ve already gifted that in the rules...
well as i already said and it practically happened, this rule leaves a room. i can select 5 players who obviously WUD NOT be playing. and then wait till 10:30 AM IST on first day and select bowlers and batsmen who performed well on that day so as to maximize my score.
ok... whats ur solution for it...
give a detailed line up of rules
we can discuss it...
batsman replacing batsman OR bowler replacing bowler is not good as well.because say Hogg is not in my team but Tait is and Hogg scores a 70 runs by 10:30AM, now i will smartly say Hogg is bowler as well, so i replace tait with hogg!same applies for Sachin, Yuvraj, Ganguly, Symonds. so its better to give freedom to choose bowler for batsman as long as weightage is similar. say difference of max 30.also game is super selector which means to prove that u r the best selector. now if the team u predict b4 match is very different (weight distribution) from team u declare with substitution, it shows that even if ur score is high u were not able to select correct team b4 hand.other suggestion of score < 30 for player substituing is to prevent ppl increasing their own score too much (by already knowing that player has already performed well)